GuildWiki has been locked down: anonymous editing and account creation are disabled. Current registered users are unaffected. Leave any comments on the Community Portal.

Category talk:Articles to be moved

From GuildWiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Does anyone often check here? Some of these articles have been here for a little while, by posting this hopefully I'll bring it to attention.

This is just a short summary, these articles I think can simply be moved right now:

  1. Obo should be renamed to OBO because it's an acronym.
  2. Commands should be renamed to Command (The "s" in unecessary). At the moment Command redirects to Commands
  3. Fiery Flame Spitter should be Flame Spitter but Fiery Flame Spitter should be a redirect according to it's talk page. (There was a few objections originally but the last couple were all for the move and nobody has objected in the last 10 days)
  4. Image:PureStrike.png can probably be deleted I think (we've got Image:Pure_Strike.jpg)
  5. Image:Morgen armor.jpg is spelt incorrectly, the guys name is Mogren not Morgen so it should be Image:Morgren armor.jpg

These ones I'm not so sure about:

  1. The discussion on changing PvP Item to PvP weapons is quite short, I don't think a conclusion has been reached yet.
  2. and the suggested moves for Guild Wars Prophecies and Template:Skill icon effect too much stuff for me to say conclusively that we can go ahead and move them.

This certainly isn't a "go do this now" type of thing (let's face everybody would just ignore it if I said that anyway), I just don't like giant tags on articles and some of these had been sitting in limbo for a little while so this is just how I see it. As I understand it, to move and delete articles an admin has to do this and my summary at the top was just an attempt to help give them a quick overview so they can make a decision on whether or not to go ahead. Thanks. --Xasxas256 20:40, 20 April 2006 (CDT)

I somewhat disagree with moving the Commands article, and started a discussion in Talk:Commands. But, I honestly don't feel super-strongly about it either way. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 18:25, 8 June 2006 (CDT)
Ha ha I brought this up so long ago, I have no idea why I didn't just move most of them then and there, maybe there'd been a recent argument about moving articles so I was trading carefully or maybe (more likely) I was just lazy and wanted someone to do the "dirty work". I'll add a note to your new command discussion. --Xasxas256 19:04, 8 June 2006 (CDT)