GuildWiki has been locked down: anonymous editing and account creation are disabled. Current registered users are unaffected. Leave any comments on the Community Portal.
Signatures or not[edit source]
Dear 220.127.116.11, I am going to assume you are Warwick or a schoolmate. You write in your summary: (Forum:Req. assistance was made by Warw, and on all of the forums we have up currently we're only signing on the talk pages. see Forum:Community Outlook - Wikia's "New Look"). So both forums were made by you, and on one of those we're signing on the talk page and on the other we're not. So who gets to decide what to use on a wiki? because Warwick created two (with ocnflictig policies), she gets to decide on all the rest? All of the forums on Wikia central (see w:Forum:Index ) have users signing their messages.
You know you broke GW:1RV instead of posting your argument here where it belongs; I will count that as support for my pending GW:RFAQL proposal.
Unless there are other coders supporting you within the next 24 hours, I am going to revert the signatures. Oh, and I am counting Merty's signature as support for my side.
F$%&§ Wikidrama. --mendel 12:40, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
- Hmmm..seems like I triggered something by accident. TBH. I don't mind, 3 or 4. Why is this a big deal ?(I always use 4 out of habbit actually) The only thing I'm concerned is that someone altered the signatures/placement of others, although by good fate I presume, but, please don't. Therefore I'll agree with mendel -- -- ( talk ) 13:30, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
- Using standard four tildes for signing comments on the forum page is fine, timestamps are needed in that case. For signing to indicate that you are watching the page, though, timestamps aren't exactly necessary, so I changed that section back to specifying three tildes. —Dr Ishmael 15:00, 12 June 2008 (UTC)