Changes: GuildWiki:Requests for adminship/Jink

Revision as of 08:32, 21 February 2011

Jink (talk • contribs • edit count • RFA page)

See Forum:Bureaucrats#Nomination: Jink. Because bureaucrat includes sysop tools, I'm opening an RfA prior to appointing Jink as a bureaucrat. This does not guarantee the RfA will pass. 05:22, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:

Jink accepted the nomination on the forum page.

Instructions

Please summarize the candidate's qualifications below. Add your summary as a brief bullet-point. Then go to the talkpage and explain your points in more detail.

To add a rebuttal to another's point, indent and add another brief bullet. Then discuss on the talkpage.

Discussions, more elaboration on a point, lengthy counter-arguments, etc. should be directed to the talkpage.

Supporting qualities

Nurturing and motherly
Married to a highly prolific editor, providing convenient contact
Is a dinosaur or something
actively plays Guild Wars
long-time loyal GuildWiki editor
long-time Guild Leader
lurks on IRC

Opposing qualities

Familial duties may prohibit availability

Neutral/Double-edged qualities

Tends to support Dr. ishmael in conflicts (but given that we don't see what happens behind the scenes, this may be a skewed perception)

Community Support

Please place your signature to indicate your support or non-support. Do not argue. Also realize that this is in no way influential towards the other merits of the candidate, just a gauge of public support.

I support this candidacy.

◄mendel► 11:42, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
Yes, I'm biased, but in this situation it seems that refraining from comment would be unacceptable. —Dr Ishmael 14:15, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
See talk. Arnout aka The Emperors Angel 20:20, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
Jinkzilla will smash anyone's bases who threaten the wiki. — Scythe 20:49, 14 Feb 2011 (UTC)
I think I've seen several conflicts by now where she was a voice of reason, including ones with Ish iirc. --El_Nazgir 22:23, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
From what little I've seen, she seems reasonable, levelheaded, and likely to take the responsibility seriously. —Wizardboy777(talk) 06:09, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
Of course -- Random Time 18:58, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
Kaede 23:21, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
From what I've seen in my lurking, I feel safe in supporting this RfA. Nwash 11:04, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
I'm no longer an actual contributor here(having mostly moved from GW to WoW), but I do still follow GW and the site, and I have no objections here. DKS01 10:18, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
Cress Arvein 23:24, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
--Łô√ë îğá†ħŕášħ 22:28, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
–alistic 08:32, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

I oppose this candidacy.

your sig here

I am neutral/undecided.

Neutral The Neutral message is the only thing that has me concerned with her being a b-crat. I'd gone support, but that could be an issue - if she sides with Ishmael and not the community one day. So, I am concerned as I don't know her views on how she might handle things like that. Ariyen 17:56, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
~~See talk. Arnout aka The Emperors Angel 19:46, 14 February 2011 (UTC)~~

@@ Line 46: / Line 46: @@
 # [[User:Cress Arvein|Cress Arvein]] [[Image:Cress sig.JPG]] 23:24, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
 # --Łô√ë [[Image:Gigathrash_sig_G.jpg]][[User:Gigathrash|<font color="Black">îğá†ħŕášħ</font>]] 22:28, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
+# &ndash;<span class="sigpic" style="font-family:Calibri;">[[File:User Balistic Pve sig.png|x19px|link=User:Balistic]][[User:Balistic|<font color="#7777cc">alistic</font>]] 08:32, 21 February 2011 (UTC)</span>
 ====I oppose this candidacy.====