The Wikia staff noticeboard is intended as a way to alert Wikia staff of issues which need their attention. This place should not be confused with the Admin noticeboard.
| Issues that Wikia staff cover | Issues that GuildWiki's Administrators or Bureaucrats cover |
|---|---|
|
|
- If you have a problem with the wiki's content, use a relevant talk page. Content problems added here will be removed.
- If you are having issues with the game, use a relevant talk page or use ArenaNet's Guild Wars support site. See how to report for instructions on reporting game bugs. Guild Wars problems added here will be removed.
To create a new request, add a new subheading (you can do it by clicking the "leave message" tab near the top of the page), providing a neutral, concise, and signed summary of the issue. It is suggested that any other users involved in an issue should be informed of its discussion here.
Can't find your request? Maybe it has been resolved.
Another bad ad
[1] Some sort of evil dating site geared toward gamers? Either way, doesn't seem appropriate. 
02:09, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
- I've reported the ad to our advertising manager and they will take a look at it shortly. -- JSharp 02:30, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
- Actually this one seems okay. --
(gem / talk) 17:17, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
- It may sound bad, but you click the link and realize it's a nerd version of Facebook. Don't worry about it. :P RoseOfKali
02:59, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for volunteering to click on the link o_O -User:PanSola (talk to the ) 03:03, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
- I'm a curious cat. I have regretted it before. But yeah, the only people on that site are the ones that actually will be impressed with the size/type of a MMO mount and not much else... Blocking that site would be kind of sad... Felix reads into things too much. :P This one really was literal, no hidden meanings. ;) RoseOfKali 21:09, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
- Well, I don't actually click these links. I just report them. How about this.
- I'm a curious cat. I have regretted it before. But yeah, the only people on that site are the ones that actually will be impressed with the size/type of a MMO mount and not much else... Blocking that site would be kind of sad... Felix reads into things too much. :P This one really was literal, no hidden meanings. ;) RoseOfKali
- Thanks for volunteering to click on the link o_O -User:PanSola (talk to the
- It may sound bad, but you click the link and realize it's a nerd version of Facebook. Don't worry about it. :P RoseOfKali
- Actually this one seems okay. --
-
- It's not that I object to cosmetic surgery, ofc; I just don't think 12-year-old kids need to learn about reshaping of the private regions while on this wiki. 16:50, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
- That one's already been reported two sections down. Kyle needs the URL to block it. ¬ Wizårdbõÿ777(talk) 17:53, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
- It's not that I object to cosmetic surgery, ofc; I just don't think 12-year-old kids need to learn about reshaping of the private regions while on this wiki.
deleted pages
is it a new thing that deleted pages are getting their entire history removed from recent changes? I know that it gets removed from a person's list of contributions but removing it from RC makes it annoying to go back and figure out who made it after it was deleted if I wanted to ban them or something. Also... didn't I read somewhere about an option to protect non-existing pages to keep them from being created? —♥Jedi♥Rogue♥ 17:31, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
- They've always disappeared from RC. -- (gem / talk) 17:42, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
- If you "recreate" the page (going to the Edit) it shows a small link which shows deleted versions. There, you can see who edited it last, and thus who made it. --- -- (s)talkpage 17:52, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
- If you "recreate" the page (going to the Edit) it shows a small link which shows deleted versions. There, you can see who edited it last, and thus who made it. ---
- The easiest way to prevent pages from being created is to use cascading protection. Create a page with links to page names that you want protected from creation, then protect that page with cascading protection (it's a check box on the protect page screen). Doing so will protect all pages linked from that page. --KyleH (talk) 19:11, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
Another Bad Ad
For some reason, whenever I view the noticeboard is when I get the bad ads... I guess it is out of spite ^.^ I'll post is right after this. X Deity X 
18:41, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
- Here... Image:Bad ad noticeboard.JPG
- Heya ... I'll be happy to report that, but in order to block it, I need to know the link it goes to (just right click on the link and click Copy Link URL). Thanks! --KyleH (talk) 19:11, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
Errors
← Moved from User talk:PanSola
A lot of the time I go onto GuildWiki (but not all the time) my Firebug error tracker repeatedly picks up this error:
urchinTracker is not defined
var wgCatId;
Also sometimes I'm given another urchinTracker error with something along the lines of this (different green lines denote different error messages):
urchinTracker is not defined
if (wgUserName == null) ...
if (wgIsArticle) ...
if (skin == null) ...
It also sometimes catches a div tag in the green part. Also, Firebug will not work at the moment, and the first bug on the huge list (which has been stacking up each time I change pages) is:
[Exception... "'Component does not have requested interface' when calling method: [nsIInterfaceRequestor::getInterface]" nsresult: "0x80004002 (NS_NOINTERFACE)" location: "<unknown>" data: no]
Any clue? --Gimmethegepgun 21:28, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
- Looks like a Wikia problem to me, I suggest moving this to the staff noticeboard. It's probably not a site-breaking problem though so I wouldn't worry too much about it. -User:PanSola (talk to the ) 23:01, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
- Does this happen on both monobook and Monaco, or just monobook? --KyleH (talk) 04:11, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
- I checked, the Urchintracker thing is still there in Monaco as well as monobook --Gimmethegepgun 02:04, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
- Does this happen on both monobook and Monaco, or just monobook? --KyleH (talk) 04:11, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
Steward
With the Wikia Migration, Entropy's Bcrat powers have decreased a tad, and she can't desysop anyone. As well as this, she can't give anyone the Bot Status, and we have 3 people currently who are going to be running bots, and so I was wondering if you could promote Entropy to a Steward (Or is that Wikia-Thing-Only?). —
Warw/Wick 19:57, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
- Entropy and I had a conversation about this here. The gist of it is that right now we can't give rights above what Entropy currently has; however, we are currently looking in to ways of expanding the powers that wiki bureaucrats have. Either way, I, or any other staff member, can modify user rights as necessary upon her request. --KyleH (talk) 04:09, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
Another Bad Ad
Not sure if we care, or if it is even against Blizzard's Code of Conduct, but www.accountbay.com is selling WoW accounts on here.
- If you see that ad again, please reply with the full URL that the ad links to by right-clicking on the ad link, clicking "Copy Link Location" or "Copy Shortcut", then pasting that link in to your message. Thanks! --KyleH (talk) 04:29, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
Special:Wantedpages
Some pages seem to be showing up in here more than once, and the extra copies say they have different numbers of links to them. But they both link to the same whatlinkshere page, with the same links. For example, R/N Touch Ranger shows up at least twice, the first saying it has 24 links, the second saying it has 21. ¬ Wizårdbõÿ777(talk) 01:36, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
- Those ones that are for builds also seem to be borked, because if you click the Whatlinkshere link you'll see that none of them are even linked. Probably needs a system cache purge --Gimmethegepgun 02:04, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
- More than likely it's due to transclusions, and the fact that the wiki engine deals with refreshing link counts (among other things) only when an article gets edited. When a source article is created with a link to a certain article, say "Article A", that adds 1 to Article A's link count. When another article is created that transcludes the first article, then Article A's link count is again increased by 1. However, there's still only 1 actual link to Article A, and it exists on the transcluded article. When the transcluded article gets edited to change the link, Article A's link count is decreased by 1. The count that the transcluding article added for Article A will not be removed until that article gets edited again. The system cache definitely needs to be purged if we've got incorrect link counts for articles that were deleted a year ago. —Dr Ishmael 04:08, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
- More than likely it's due to transclusions, and the fact that the wiki engine deals with refreshing link counts (among other things) only when an article gets edited. When a source article is created with a link to a certain article, say "Article A", that adds 1 to Article A's link count. When another article is created that transcludes the first article, then Article A's link count is again increased by 1. However, there's still only 1 actual link to Article A, and it exists on the transcluded article. When the transcluded article gets edited to change the link, Article A's link count is decreased by 1. The count that the transcluding article added for Article A will not be removed until that article gets edited again. The system cache definitely needs to be purged if we've got incorrect link counts for articles that were deleted a year ago. —Dr Ishmael
The deletion log
Is borked? See this. Note that the offset number in that URL is approximately one decillion, and it's showing edits from august 2007. ¬ Wizårdbõÿ777(talk) 02:07, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
- It went back beyond the beginning of time and wrapped around, obviously d-: -User:PanSola (talk to the ) 02:11, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
- Yay everyone's back and I've still got all my teeth! --Xasxas256 02:39, 7 May 2008 (UTC)