Crasher17446@legacy41699648 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
GW-SolaPan@legacy41689516 (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:Why does the stub exist at all? Was there something particularly wrong with the general stub template? Is there even a reason for a "combat" article to exist? --[[User:68.142.14.69|68.142.14.69]] 10:08, 20 March 2006 (CST) |
:Why does the stub exist at all? Was there something particularly wrong with the general stub template? Is there even a reason for a "combat" article to exist? --[[User:68.142.14.69|68.142.14.69]] 10:08, 20 March 2006 (CST) |
||
| + | |||
| + | ::Very good question, and I have no answer to your question. Might want to ask [[User:Gem]] about it. -[[User:SolaPan|SolaPan]] 10:12, 20 March 2006 (CST) |
||
Revision as of 16:12, 20 March 2006
Um. There's 37 links to this non-existant article. Was this deleted at some point? - Greven 08:09, 20 March 2006 (CST)
- no, there are probably 37 articles using the combat-stub template, that was recently invented I believe. -SolaPan 09:01, 20 March 2006 (CST)
Ok, I've put something in there that absolutely says nothing in the context of the combat-stubs. But since it means something totally different from the "combat" in skill descriptions, I am not going to keep it as a redirect (which was what I originally did to the article). -SolaPan 09:18, 20 March 2006 (CST)
- Why does the stub exist at all? Was there something particularly wrong with the general stub template? Is there even a reason for a "combat" article to exist? --68.142.14.69 10:08, 20 March 2006 (CST)