GuildWiki has been locked down: anonymous editing and account creation are disabled. Current registered users are unaffected. Leave any comments on the Community Portal.

Talk:Cover hex

From GuildWiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Err. Why does a coverup hex make it harder for a monk to remove the other hex? Is there some hex that is resistant to removal? --Nkuvu 15:22, 28 December 2005 (UTC)

Because hexes act as a stack and hex removal skills always remove from the top of the stack first. Same thing with enchantements. --theeth 15:45, 28 December 2005 (UTC)

Oops...[edit source]

Forgot to mention that, changed it.


Now onto Pressure builds... --Origin415

terminology[edit source]

Is "coverup hex" really the term used? I've always heard it as "cover hex". "Coverup" has a different connotation that, while it -could- be stretched to fit.. is still pretty awkward. --Nunix 15:49, 28 December 2005 (UTC)

Well I'll mention that...I'm also going to write a separate page for stacking hexes, as it is a slightly different --Origin415
I've also never heard the "up." I'll move it later, unless someone strongly objects. --Fyren 16:41, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
Moved. --Fyren 00:26, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

Links to here[edit source]

Right now Spiteful Spirit and Suffering link here, noting that they are often covered/cover. Should we mention this on various skill pages or just in this article? --Fyren 00:26, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

Cover?[edit source]

It says Ulcerous Lungs is used as a cover? A 15 energy hex seems a rather expensive cover... --Necromancer-icon-small.pngSkax459 22:14, 26 May 2007 (CDT)

and a 2 cast time at that. Besides, I've never seen this used as a cover hex, ever, not even in RA. And some other stuff of the other stuff is questionable. Do we realy need that many examples? I mean if we just had Parasitic Bond, which is the most used cover hex in the game, I think they would get the point. I don't think this list has actually helped anybody. M s4 22:20, 26 May 2007 (CDT)
It says Wastrel's Worry is a cover... hmm, 3 secs, w00t! ~~ User:Frvwfr2 frvwfr2 (talk)(contributions) 12:16, 12 June 2007 (CDT)