Cobalt2273@legacy41685488 (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
Gildan Bladeborn@legacy41690134 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
::It DOES seem a trifle odd to have a quick reference page for a single item, but the alternative is to add it to the main list and have the quick reference section lie to you, and that's never good. At least the paragon one I made has more then one thing listed, ha ha. -[[User:Gildan Bladeborn|Gildan Bladeborn]] 19:26, 4 April 2008 (UTC) |
::It DOES seem a trifle odd to have a quick reference page for a single item, but the alternative is to add it to the main list and have the quick reference section lie to you, and that's never good. At least the paragon one I made has more then one thing listed, ha ha. -[[User:Gildan Bladeborn|Gildan Bladeborn]] 19:26, 4 April 2008 (UTC) |
||
:::Why did you have to disrupt the very pertinent discussion about the excellence of this pages excellency :/--<B>[[User:Cobalt|<font color="Blue">Cobalt </font>]] </B>| [[User talk:Cobalt|<font color="Green"><B>Talk</B></font>]] 19:38, 4 April 2008 (UTC) |
:::Why did you have to disrupt the very pertinent discussion about the excellence of this pages excellency :/--<B>[[User:Cobalt|<font color="Blue">Cobalt </font>]] </B>| [[User talk:Cobalt|<font color="Green"><B>Talk</B></font>]] 19:38, 4 April 2008 (UTC) |
||
+ | ::::Because I thought that might have been sarcasm? Don't let me stop you from complimenting it of course, I like hearing how my ridiculous quick reference page is excellent (huzzah). -[[User:Gildan Bladeborn|Gildan Bladeborn]] 16:52, 5 April 2008 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 16:52, 5 April 2008
What an excellent page. XD 19:21, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
- A VERY excellent page if I do say so myself.--163.248.168.191 19:23, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
- It DOES seem a trifle odd to have a quick reference page for a single item, but the alternative is to add it to the main list and have the quick reference section lie to you, and that's never good. At least the paragon one I made has more then one thing listed, ha ha. -Gildan Bladeborn 19:26, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
- Why did you have to disrupt the very pertinent discussion about the excellence of this pages excellency :/--Cobalt | Talk 19:38, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
- Because I thought that might have been sarcasm? Don't let me stop you from complimenting it of course, I like hearing how my ridiculous quick reference page is excellent (huzzah). -Gildan Bladeborn 16:52, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
- Why did you have to disrupt the very pertinent discussion about the excellence of this pages excellency :/--Cobalt | Talk 19:38, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
- It DOES seem a trifle odd to have a quick reference page for a single item, but the alternative is to add it to the main list and have the quick reference section lie to you, and that's never good. At least the paragon one I made has more then one thing listed, ha ha. -Gildan Bladeborn 19:26, 4 April 2008 (UTC)