GuildWiki has been locked down: anonymous editing and account creation are disabled. Current registered users are unaffected. Leave any comments on the Community Portal.

Talk:Elementalist Elite Flameforged armor

From GuildWiki
Jump to: navigation, search

The red dye effect does not look as described in the notes. Yes, they're different shades but only of the dye that's applied to it. I applied red dye to this and, that's what I got, different shades of red; no yellow or orange.

75k?[edit source]

Armor price is 60k, cause head part is not counting,it's not on the list and it is same as Droknar one The Kall 14:46, 6 August 2007 (CDT)

Disappearing Lace?[edit source]

Not sure if this is just me, but of late I've seen several people with the female version of this armor and all of it was 15k, but only the pieces connecting to the Boots and Chest piece had lace showing, the Gloves and Leg Piece were now showing bare skin. Is this a bug? Has anyone else noticed the same? Liselle Morrow 07:13, 20 August 2007 (CDT)

They probably didn't have all the 15k parts,just a mix between 15k and 1k. My armor shows up just fine 84.24.206.123 08:26, 20 August 2007 (CDT)
No seriously, I know what i saw. The Leg Piece definitely wasn't a 1k piece, it looks a world apart. Besides one of the people was one of my guildies and I know he has a full set. Just wondering if it's something wrong with the textures on my end or wether it's general. It may show it properly on your screen, but not to everyone around you, because the detail level for others is lower. Liselle Morrow 08:52, 20 August 2007 (CDT)


Black Dye doesn't color Gloves[edit source]

Has anyone noticed that black dye doesn't color the gloves properly? I have a character with this armor, and black dye on the gloves does not turn the flames on the hand black. This matches the pictures also - the gloves don't seem to dye properly. Bug?

Excessive dye section[edit source]

We do NOT need four different pictures of the male armor dyed. I'm not sure which one we want to leave in, though, as none of them fit the template, so I'm not going to be the one to remove the others.

handled. --GW-Blackdog 07:40, 27 September 2008 (UTC)