GuildWiki has been locked down: anonymous editing and account creation are disabled. Current registered users are unaffected. Leave any comments on the Community Portal.

Talk:Jeweled Daggers

From GuildWiki
Jump to: navigation, search

If you use a "Measure for Measure" inscription (i.e. highly salvageable) on these babies the chance of getting a jewel goes way up (i've gotten several). Can someone quantify "very low" anyway? --MasterPatricko 15:22, 16 November 2006 (CST)

I think the original statement was effective enough "The salvage rate for gems is very low" without the added "and almost never salvages to gems". I know several people who have yet to salvage one out, so I would say the chances are "low", but "almost never" is stretching it. I've gotten 2 gems out of 6 daggers without using highly salvagable inscriptions. I'll edit the article again so it's less definite in its wording until someone does a salvage batch on these things. - BeXoR Bexor.png 16:20, 16 November 2006 (CST)
Did the MfM inscription on it and got a Ruby on the first shot RangerTomoko 10:31, 20 November 2006 (CST)
Ditto. Very nice. I wish I kept the rest of my MfM inscrips because wow. :D Morgan Fairweather 17:16, 6 June 2007 (CDT)

Heh. Nice picture. —Aranth Mesmer 00:24, 22 November 2006 (CST)

Love the picture. Hahaha.

Unconfirmed[edit source]

What part of that statement is unconfirmed? - BeXoR Bexor.png 02:18, 12 December 2006 (CST)

See Measure for Measure for details Lightblade 02:36, 12 December 2006 (CST)
So you're saying because people aren't sure what the inscription does? I've gotten two jewels from daggers. One pair was white and the other was blue. Neither had a MfM in them. Highly salvageable has always meant that you get more of a material or a higher chance for a rare. Why would the inscription be different? - BeXoR Bexor.png 02:44, 12 December 2006 (CST)
you never get more than one gem from a dagger- and it seems like measure for measure only
raises the amount of material The preceding unsigned comment was added by (talk • contribs) 21:17, February 21, 2007 (CDT).
This is incorrect; I have gotten two sapphires from a single gold pair of jeweled daggers with measure for measure on them. No SS. DeathFlame131 21:07, 1 March 2007 (CST)
Good to know :) --Tomoko's Cookie.jpg (talk)

Non-inscribable?[edit source]

I just got a pair of non-inscribable jeweled daggers on my way to Chantry of Secrets. Is this unusual? --Armond Warblade Warrior(talk) 04:29, 17 April 2007 (CDT)

nope--Blade Smallscout.png (talk|contribs) 18:10, 21 April 2007 (CDT)

Two rubies from one (pair) of daggers[edit source]

Not sure if it's been mentioned somewhere, but salvaging a gold pair of these with measure for measure yielded me two rubies. I can post a pic, if it's needed.--Mafaraxas 07:55, 8 July 2007 (CDT)

I just salvaged 1 Ruby from a pair of Jeweled Daggers with Measure for Measure on it. --Mooseyfate 23:31, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

55 Bones from a pair of jeweled daggers[edit source]

I just salvaged a pair for jeweled daggers modded with "measure for measure" and they gave 55 bones.

Salvage rate?[edit source]

What's the salvage rate on these puppies, anyway? I just salvaged a pair of white jeweled daggers and got a sapphire. Was I just really, really lucky? Should we start salvage research, or is it worth it? 00:45, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

Holdings of Chokin[edit source]

Ive got 2 q9 Jeweled daggers drop here from rain/rock beetles. -- 07:51, 17 July 2009 (UTC)