GuildWiki

GuildWiki has been locked down: anonymous editing and account creation are disabled. Current registered users are unaffected. Leave any comments on the Community Portal.

READ MORE

GuildWiki
Advertisement

He is the exact same as the real thing. Usually, we just put the mini navbox on the page of the creature that also has a mini version of them. Why different here? I know there are many specific miniature pages, and not all minis correspond to the skin of their named creature, like Vizu and Polar Bear, so should we just make a page for each mini, and finally make use of that old miniature gallery (though it might have been deleted now). RoseOfKali RoseOfKaliSIG 18:20, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

I'm not sure... it was a dead link from the Traveler's Gift page and I thought I'd fill it in because I had one. I don't think it'd be a bad idea to have a separate page for each mini, mainly because so many of them have different skins. This one is a unique one so I guess it could have its own page. (Then again, the eye of Janthir is unique too, and is full of lame sauce) XD --Zyanya386 10:57, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
Imho, it warrants a separate page because it cannot be acquired like "normal" minis (i.e. birthday presents). Iirc, that's the reason the Moa mini has a separate page(not 100% sure though). --- Ohaider! -- (contribs) (talk) 13:00, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
The black moa chick mini has a unique skin that is not like any other monster, so it had to get a page, there was nothing else to link it to. This wasn't at all a "bad idea" as Zyanya put it, I was just wondering why this was different from say Ghostly Hero, Naga Raincaller or Kanaxai, which don't have their own mini pages, but just the mini navbox on the monster page. RoseOfKali RoseOfKaliSIG 20:56, 1 May 2009 (UTC)


There is an animation by creased comics about george washington that opens by describing him as "six foot eight, weighs a f---ing ton." I'm guessing the flavor text is a reference.

I stated the same thing on the Professor Yakkington page, although to no response...--Bsweany 21:32, May 3, 2010 (UTC)
Advertisement