GuildWiki has been locked down: anonymous editing and account creation are disabled. Current registered users are unaffected. Leave any comments on the Community Portal.

Hi Gamepedia users and contributors! Please complete this survey to help us learn how to better meet your needs in the future. We have one for editors and readers. This should only take about 7 minutes!

Talk:Monk Elite Canthan armor

From GuildWiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Headgear[edit source]

Anyone with a bald monk got 15k they're willing to shell out so we can see what this head tattoo looks like? It's almost certainly different from the standard.

My monk isn't quite completely bald, so you can't see the very back of the pattern. But it's better than nothing. -- Desbreko 01:47, 30 July 2006 (CDT)


I uploaded pictures of my 15k scalp design dyed black. I hope that helps you out. :) -- Reddog500 22:13, 18 March 2007 (CDT)

Dyeable areas[edit source]

Do we need all these color variations? I thought the dyeable areas section was only to show where it affects your armor, not how. Heinrich 15:25, 16 October 2006 (CDT)

I think the blue one is enough, it shows clearly what parts is dyeable. But maybe it's nice for poeple buying this to see it in different colors.. I don't know. — Stylva 00:44, 17 October 2006 (CDT)
It's always nice to see the different colours, to avoid wasted money on a dye you didn't want. Although, I think it's enough with one. You should always follow what we have on other articles. The experiments with dyes is really part of the excitement with a new armor, don't you agree?
I say no more than one colour.
| -- Helena Ranger-icon-small.png 00:51, 17 October 2006 (CDT)

With the new dye preview feature in the game, the 20 images of different dyes are no longer needed

White Dye[edit source]

Too bad the white dye is a little bit different from the white areas on the armor itself :( Would be nice if that could be changed. Strike When Ready 20:24, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

i hadnt noticed the difference till i read your coment. it still looks great.--JRyan 09:04, 5 January 2008 (UTC)