GuildWiki has been locked down: anonymous editing and account creation are disabled. Current registered users are unaffected. Leave any comments on the Community Portal.

Talk:Permanent Shadow Form

From GuildWiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Argue this and argue that[edit source]

"Other argue that nerfing Shadow Form will destroy farming in general, although others may counter argue in this claim." I like to remove that line or have it rephrased. Currently it only says 'they are discussing if it destroys farming and they both have arguments'. This comment doesn't give any useful information IMHO .. -- Merty sign.gif-- ( talk ) 15:06, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Imho, chop up the article en whole. A lot of opinions and such... All you need is the first 3 sections, and the second can be shortened down a lot too. --- Ohaider!-- (s)talkpage 15:08, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

I think it's pretty obvious this has already destroyed the Glob of Ectoplasm. Long Term possibly if its not nerfed soon. PossessedLinebeck 12:47, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

related to Sweep?[edit source]

don't see why. Meraida 04:54, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Legacy[edit source]

I propose adding a legacy template now since it's FINALLY been nerfed to hell --Gimmethegepgun 03:43, February 26, 2010 (UTC)

Bump --Gimmethegepgun 19:47, February 26, 2010 (UTC)
This article was out of date long before yesterday's update. But, technically, SF is still able to be maintained permanently. --Macros 20:28, February 26, 2010 (UTC)
But the whole concept of Perma has been destroyed, which makes it viable for a legacy tag imo. --TalkpageEl_Nazgir 21:08, February 26, 2010 (UTC)