Talk:Ritualist Shing Jea armor

From GuildWiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Equip an bow and die with this armor. On a female ritualist you can see her full cleavage

"Vandalism"[edit source]

So what, we can't have a description of the armor? This is stupid, there wasn't even a discussion, just a locking. Very un-mod like.--Darksyde 21:44, March 18, 2010 (UTC)

"Ginormous jugs"? "Gay pride belt"? Why are you even contesting this? —Dr Ishmael Diablo the chicken.gif 21:49, March 18, 2010 (UTC)
It was a pretty terrible description, as well as not really appropriate. Good joke, though :) --- VipermagiSig.JPG -- (contribs) (talk) 21:50, March 18, 2010 (UTC)
And I only set the protection to block anons and "new users" (whatever that means), it's not like I completely locked it down. —Dr Ishmael Diablo the chicken.gif 21:57, March 18, 2010 (UTC)

I don't know about you, but whenever I see this armor I think "Giant tits" and "Gay pride". Crude description is better than no description, imo.--Darksyde 02:55, March 20, 2010 (UTC)

No. Not everyone shares in your opinion. Jink 03:57, March 20, 2010 (UTC)
Rits get bigger than this. It would be a shame to waste such a colorful description on a second-place armor. Entropy Sig.jpg (T/C) 04:11, March 20, 2010 (UTC)
A few are close, but I don't think it can reliably be stated that any of them are the biggest. Maybe regular Kurzick --Gimmethegepgun 04:45, March 20, 2010 (UTC)
lol, A page protected just due to busty pixel. Nice job anet, they indeed get much money by sex-sell. Did any one noticed that female Ritualists have the most physic effects on her boobs? --140.128.69.99 09:05, March 26, 2010 (UTC)
No more than Eles and Necros. Also, sex sells :> --- VipermagiSig.JPG -- (contribs) (talk) 09:50, March 26, 2010 (UTC)

There, I made it less "crude".--Darksyde 23:54, March 29, 2010 (UTC)

It's still adolescent and offensive. Grow up. —Dr Ishmael Diablo the chicken.gif 01:29, March 30, 2010 (UTC)
Instead of revert warring, let's settle on a description that everyone can agree to. Personally, I think the words "flattering" and "colorful" would fit nicely. Felix Omni Signature.png 03:28, March 30, 2010 (UTC)
Other than the little bitty bits of color around the waist and the headwrap, it's really not all that colorful. Jink 14:13, March 30, 2010 (UTC)
Why in the heck is an argument of this level even happening among more veteran editors is my first question. DNA I remember you as being a very well thought out and helpful contributor back when I was active around here. For what reason does this armor article need to bestow a detailed description of the females cleavage and the males sexual preference? If you look at the descriptions for the other armor articles, they are all as standards as this one. Can we please just drop this petty argument before this escalates further? -- Isk8.png Isk8 (T/C) 14:40, March 30, 2010 (UTC)