GuildWiki has been locked down: anonymous editing and account creation are disabled. Current registered users are unaffected. Leave any comments on the Community Portal.

Talk:Wintersday in July

From GuildWiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Merged from Talk:Wintersday in July 2008[edit source]

I support the actual creation of the page 100%--71.29.197.189 20:49, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

Then we should add drops, info about snowball fights, and anything else that happens. I know eggnog and snowman summoners drop. Zefirsig.jpgGod Zefir 23:35, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
And fruitcake....and some mysterious Freezie tonic...--71.29.197.189 01:02, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
We didn't make a page when we had gamer weekend or easter egg/bunny drop or shamrock drop weekends. why does this weekend get a page? Theres a weekend event every week... —JediRogue 06:51, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
Because this event is more complex, and more is happening than is contained in the login announcement? --◄mendel► 10:59, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
Halp, undocumented changes! :O Anyways, I agree with Mendel on this. It's not covered by ANet, so we should, right? --- Ohaider!-- (s)talkpage 11:50, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

Epic fail[edit source]

It's probably... most stupid weekend i ever seen. Excuse me - i love Winsterday but NOT LIKE THAT - no decorations, no collectors - gah... --217.98.242.135 15:43, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

This isn't GWG. Also, I love farming for drops for my titles so nyeehhhh. 75.33.219.182 20:31, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

Wintersday in July 2009[edit source]

Some Mischievous Tonics dropped as well. Should it be added to the list? ~~ GW-Saikano

Merged from Talk:Wintersday in July 2009[edit source]

The lag is just flat out stupid. Guild Wars has gone down some of course with age, fewer resources, but this is just crazy. It seems like it is getting worse with every event that happens. Spikeicon.pngTenetke 19:44, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

notice the Average not a single spike

Merge[edit source]

Guess I'll start this off then, even if it's a few years late :) My thinking is, that if the event is recurring the exact same thing every year, then I don't believe multiple articles need to be generated by year - if there's a major change in the event, then I think an article should be generated. If it's a minor one (changed date doesn't count), then make a note of it, and move on. That's my take. Aloha, Mauirixxx 06:52, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

Done and done. —Dr Ishmael Diablo the chicken.gif 15:03, 16 July 2011 (UTC)