GuildWiki

GuildWiki has been locked down: anonymous editing and account creation are disabled. Current registered users are unaffected. Leave any comments on the Community Portal.

READ MORE

GuildWiki
mNo edit summary
(we could solve my original problem by adding .css for the small tag)
Line 2: Line 2:
 
:I don't want a template like that. If you feel the current style is unacceptable, delete the template and I'll make do without. --<span class="sigpic">[[User:M.mendel|◄mendel►]]</span> 21:38, September 26, 2010 (UTC)
 
:I don't want a template like that. If you feel the current style is unacceptable, delete the template and I'll make do without. --<span class="sigpic">[[User:M.mendel|◄mendel►]]</span> 21:38, September 26, 2010 (UTC)
 
::Uh, what? I sorta agree with Ish that having to combine two differently formatted tags is less than intuitive. Why do you feel the template benefits from this way? --[[User:JonTheMon|JonTheMon]] 04:03, September 27, 2010 (UTC)
 
::Uh, what? I sorta agree with Ish that having to combine two differently formatted tags is less than intuitive. Why do you feel the template benefits from this way? --[[User:JonTheMon|JonTheMon]] 04:03, September 27, 2010 (UTC)
  +
:::I wanted a shortcut to an adapted &lt;small> tag, saving me typing the style out by hand, and being easier to read and less disruptive to the wikitext. If that's not intuitive enough for you, just delete it. I did think about a ''Template:/small'' , but that'd just be the &lt;/small> tag with another name, so kinda pointless.
  +
:::Maybe we could solve my original problem better by adding .css for the small tag to set the line height to 130%, if you feel this would be ok to apply everywhere on the wiki. (If it works correctly, then the comparison on the template docs here should look identical.) --<span class="sigpic">[[User:M.mendel|◄mendel►]]</span> 10:17, September 27, 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 10:17, 27 September 2010

The current usage ({{small}}Some text</small>) is non-intuitive. It should be like other templates where the affected text is the template parameter ({{small|Some text}}). —Dr Ishmael Diablo the chicken 13:16, September 26, 2010 (UTC)

I don't want a template like that. If you feel the current style is unacceptable, delete the template and I'll make do without. --◄mendel► 21:38, September 26, 2010 (UTC)
Uh, what? I sorta agree with Ish that having to combine two differently formatted tags is less than intuitive. Why do you feel the template benefits from this way? --JonTheMon 04:03, September 27, 2010 (UTC)
I wanted a shortcut to an adapted <small> tag, saving me typing the style out by hand, and being easier to read and less disruptive to the wikitext. If that's not intuitive enough for you, just delete it. I did think about a Template:/small , but that'd just be the </small> tag with another name, so kinda pointless.
Maybe we could solve my original problem better by adding .css for the small tag to set the line height to 130%, if you feel this would be ok to apply everywhere on the wiki. (If it works correctly, then the comparison on the template docs here should look identical.) --◄mendel► 10:17, September 27, 2010 (UTC)