User:Mendel/Talk Archive 6

Archive 1

­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Welcome ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Old talk about split skill... ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ well well ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ .js ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Regarding the role of policy ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Specific ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ In that case ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ spam filter workaround ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Wiki Status (¬_¬) ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ <3 ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ The subject stays the same (Tic TOC) ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Page Title Doctoring ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Templates ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Unyielding Aura ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ GuildWiki:Cleanup after Maybot ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Nice ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Flechette ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ You Win: ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ My favorite food ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Auron Vendetta? ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Legendary Sword ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Edit Summaries ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Timestamping

Archive 2

­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Armor crafting project ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Category:Pages with too many expensive parser function calls ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ lol ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ talking to Entropy on Xasxas256's talkpage ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ important part of the political process ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Hi ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ New user with questionable contribution ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ 1RV ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ User talk: Agent Wolf ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Tips ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Was this really necessary? ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ [ups]? ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Controversy guide ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ nubcake ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ google and redirects ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Zomg Grammerz ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Thank You ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Poll, please ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Re: User talk:24.163.84.34

Archive 3

­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ RfA ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Correct naming ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Iron Arch ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Link you wanted (Podax Vandal) ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Re: Vipermagi#preaching to the ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Hey ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ rfa/irc ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Skills used/Items dropped ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Interrupting your regular logical discussions with the following: ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ galleries ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ temporary Wiki break ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ readable Templates ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Why does this work? ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ placing images in text ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Skill Bar ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Contest: No edit history ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ force a null display ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Doc Ish is on the case! ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Storeh ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ thanks ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Alana Pekpek ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Nice ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Pfft. ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ I'm bored too much? ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Spam and Axe Galleries ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Gallery project thoughts ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Acorns ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ What do you think...

Archive 4

­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ RfA ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Hey ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ I'm using Restore Life on RFA! ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Archiv'd ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Do you have a problem with me? ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Reactor Blast Timer ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Redirects ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ progress bar ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Category:User skill icons ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Storeh ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ "set guildwiki2 up as independent project again, plan international wiki for GW2 " ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ unattributed images ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ new image categories ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Upload vs. MiniUpload ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ license ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Pssst ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ USSW ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Category:Categories ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ IRC ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ example ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Python foot ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ so there was one of those quick link-ads at the bottom of the page ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Thanks ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Vote on my User Page!!!!!! ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Redirects 2 ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Anomalies ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Area_of_effect_skills_quick_reference ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Absence ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ New parser ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Category:Pages with too many expensive parser function calls ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ an idea ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ on "teh" talkpage, huh

Archive 5

­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Promotion ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ GASP! ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ My density far exceeds yours ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ The truth ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Advice ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Champagne ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Drop rate ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Symbolic? ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ ∞ ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ hey you ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Elemental ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ you presumably have shared a bed ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Immortalized ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ This code ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ About guildwiki.fr ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Your userpage obscures Log out link ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ User_talk:Fire Tock ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Boobies card ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Page views ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Webcomics ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ disabling navbar ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Wintersday Userbox! ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Thanks ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ px vs. em ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Please template ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Pain ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ You have new ice ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Yes! ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ IE sucks ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Wintersday in GWW ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Signet of Capture png ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ theft ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Edit summaries ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Thanx ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ User:Mendel ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Thanks ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ answer to comment from Warwick rfa ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ not a top wiki ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ wintersday CSS/JS bug reports ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Golden mendel ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ A huge thanks from the creator of another wiki ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ What? ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Sigs ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ portlet links vandalism ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ What did you do to your userpage? ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Dragon Festivus decorations ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Sig list

Archive 6

­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ GW:NPA ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Archive ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ from User talk:Tenetke: ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ from User talk:Auron of Neon: ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Discussion ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ related comments ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Apology to Entropy ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Opinion please Mendel ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Mendel's evil plan ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Congratulations ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ I go away for a bit to study anatomy and... ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ also, lolwUt ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ "Completely unrelated to everything above" apology ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Administrator Information poll ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ idea for new feature ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Multiple subjects, all in one (sorry) ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ unwanted response section ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Example ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Peek-a-boo, I steal from you ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ IE tabs ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ *poke* ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ guildwars.com unavailable ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Template talk:Faintheartedness ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Template question ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ black and white smileys ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ smiley drafts ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Lost Generation ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ About the sidebar ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ World University ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Update 2005: Updated monster difficulty in Augury Rock ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ GW:YAV ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Cursing ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Testimonial ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ User talkpage: Archive question ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Vanquishing ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ orphaned redirects ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Focus templates ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Junundu help ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ PvXwiki poll / announcement discussion ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Folding like a napkin, revisited ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Opinion needed ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ I ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Image editing ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Norn, Asuran, Deldrimor & Monumental Farming boost ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ help needed ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ example ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ User page

Archive 7

­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ These guys! ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ No fucking way. ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Moar userboxes ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Symbolic Kick (Placeholder) - Autocat with Location InfoBox ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ The Circle Game ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Postcard ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Your comment vs. my virgin talk page ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Archiving ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ I am curious ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Comments ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Kongregate ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ mediawiki resizing of images ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ I got blocked ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ To my Darthipedia Brethren ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Not talking to me ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ in the eyes of onlookers ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ trolls ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ BTW ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Images on page ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Duplication of content allowed on Wikia ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ You have achieved negative leet ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Image ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Sungs ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Chest Glitch ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ category: wtf? ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ sigpic hack ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Probably wasn't the smartest idea for April Fool's ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Well, I tried ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Why are people blocked? ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Interjection ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Distributing new QR page ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ New Policy? ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Image question ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ SigPic ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Sysops, Beercrats, Rollbackers ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Rollback ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Very funny ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Hysterically long

Archive 8

­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Symbolic Kick - Autocat with Location InfoBox ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ hop on IRC ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Postcard ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Never give all the Heart ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Hi-res hotlinking ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Like hi. ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Remove vandal ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ 2.0 points of experience ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Coding ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Saved from .5Bfail.5D - thank you.21 ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ The Magdalene Laundries ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ RL money opinion please ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Moving Contributions ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ can't join IRC (+r) ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Semantic MediaWiki ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ On Edit Fire ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Zaishen Combat ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Page editing disabled, but not? ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Wiki ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Moo! ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ reverse engineering dept ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Who are you? ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Changing my prot level? ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ search text bug ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Kurzick/Luxon skill icons ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ DUDE ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Just read the ticket. ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Wednesday May 3 ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Thanks for solving my CSS problem ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ A sincere apology ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Sperm Boots ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Typing fial ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Now with 100% less fail! ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Don't forget! ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Not duplicate ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Capitalization ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Don't mind me, I'm just rambling on. ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ licensing ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ My RC widget is a widget of your countributions :P ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Your bodies will ornate my chambers forever ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ editing ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Scraping ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Don't forget! ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Help pls ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Bureaucrats at Official Wiki ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Since you insisted ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Random Was Signature? ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ linkie ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Quantum theory ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Because I know you like looking at them ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Favicon ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Blogs ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Me. ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ The main character died, now WTF do we do? ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Validation ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Uploading GW music to wiki ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Wikia impressed me... ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ WikiAnswers Widget ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ User talk:Vipermagi#zzzZZZzzz ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ A favor ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Wintersday cleanups ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Site cache ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Isn't it your... B-DAY?! ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Link color .css - useful or not? ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ talk about overflow on your talk page ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Hi mendel! ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Awesome skin? ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Absence ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Return of the...Queen ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Special:RevisionDelete for sysops ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ rollback ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ We interrupt your normally scheduled spam period for an advertisement. ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ <- sidebar ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Some lands ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ I will be leaving Soon ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Hi ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ GuildWiki:Oversight

Archive 9

­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Clean slate ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Mendeeeeeeel ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Nyquil based Hallucinations ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Shameless advertisement and Giga ripoff ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Your edit to the Zchallenge page ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ uhhh... I broke something ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Doing the right thing wrong ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Broken Links... ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Janitorial rights ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Pic doesn't wanna update ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ zomg ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Guild Wars on Linux ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ This is a public Service Announcement courtesy of GD&D ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ mgdoNEHt ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ aedi lanigironu na ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Hey Mendel! ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Edit Count figure ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ User:M.mendel/wikianswers ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Wintersday ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Happy New Year ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Hey, listen! ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Pronz?! ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ stop it ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Wikisoft ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Formulation ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ User priorities ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ We can be exile buddies! ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Thank you for your service ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ I cared! ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ New Userpage ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ It's time I went ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ "I'm also listening to the people who don't care" ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Changing what I think ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ If you're going to go... ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Subnormality ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ I'm remaining a bureaucrat ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ The Wise Man's Fear ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Salutations ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Subst teacher? ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ school wiki ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ SuBtle hint

Archive 10

­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Archive sizes ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Archive sighses ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Randomness ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Custom navbar/font-size in other skins, mediawiki ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ possible ShowHide bug ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Auto search PvX? ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ The Battle for Lion's Arch info ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ GW:SIGN ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Ishy ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Happy B-Day Gregor ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ you arrogant twat ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ i'm an arrogant twat, too ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ SMW ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ E-books ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Job queue? ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ New Style Optional ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ < Gr8 (~fun) ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Guilded Age ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Meanwhile, in Hawaii... ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Note to self about behavioural ads ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Dungeon chest contents - opting out ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Cold Turkey ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Because I'm biased.... ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Re: Carbon ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Template:Small ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ CSS ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ New wiki ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Your details ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Thank you! ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Oasis is a good thing ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Forks and knives? ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ spots ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Curse ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Pipe ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Stephen Fry, grammar, language, and a link ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Generating a talkpage notification email ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ You know what to do. ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Welcome to Community Central! ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ dots 2.0 ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Minor tweak to Sitenotice template ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ gww pageviews ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Rhythm pack ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Congratulations! ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Just noticed ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ where "fr:" interwiki links go to ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ giant section header ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ First! (and last?) ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Sorry to distract your FAQ... ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Thanks... ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Drop windows ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Thanks for the welcome ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Image move ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Login troubles ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ You idiot. ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ protective ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ RC hide user ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Hey, you! ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Echo Bazaar ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Recommended videos ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Is it possible to be dyslexic in Chinese? ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ The RPG ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Moved pages ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Nicely done ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Template of the Intolerable

Archive 11

­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ This section title does not coincide with the section contents. ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Questions and Answers ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Category confusion ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ re: IRC ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Bump (you seemed to have addressed an entirely different point) ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ removing May's colon ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ High-use user templates ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Recursive aruments and relativety ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Thanks re:Template:TitleBars ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ I have stopped reading... ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ response ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Policy proposal: Be 50% wrong! ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ if I went to work every day dressed as a hobo ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Twitter ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Warning. ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Warning (Part 2; the unofficial version) ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ tl;dr ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ zzz ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ categories on collector armor pages ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ I hearby declate ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Tisk ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ TEF's suggestion ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ As I was saying (about DDG) ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ DDG other reviews ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Ignore User ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ food for thought ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Dilbert's creator caught socking ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Dungeon Fighter Online ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Firefox 4 ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Trader of Stories ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Since the edit was here, I'll respond here ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ Well, I found a link you'd be interested in. ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ I found an article you might be interested in ­­­­◦­­­­­­­­ You should know better... (and I should have not derailed...or at least done a better job of it)

IRC This user frequents the #gwiki IRC channel. This user is happy to help new members of GuildWiki; just leave a message on his/her Talk page.

IRC can be a quick way to resolve issues of no lasting importance or for things that don't deserve to be written down. Use /query mendel to talk to me (semi-)privately on irc. --mendel

^{I reserve the right to edit section titles to coincide with the section content.}

Comments

GW:NPA

I think some people want to change it to GW:NPAUTDI (No personal attacks, unless they deserve it) :P Silver Sunlight (T/C) 16:34, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood. — Article 1 of the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR)

Don't shoot people unless they deserve it. --◄mendel► 21:39, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Postscriptum: do try and write Game balance. --◄mendel► 21:40, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

I have reverted your block. Saying someone fails at understanding game balance is not a personal attack. It falls under "Don't be a dick", perhaps, but certainly not GW:NPA in a blockworthy fashion. Also, real life laws do not apply here, and we all know the U.N. is garbage when it comes to practical matters anyway. (T/C) 06:35, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

I'd let it pass if it was a simple statement made in the course of a discussion. This was a well-crafted paragraph posted out of context on the user's talkpage. It addressed a single user, it contained opinion, not fact, the opinion is strongly negative, it made statements about the adressee, not about the poster, it it went quite further than just stating that he doesn't understand game balance, and I am quite sure that most people who read such a statement on their userpage would be offended by it. It not only feels like a personal attack, I think by the criteria listed, you can't deny it is one, and I am not the only one who sees it that way.

Is this the style of discussion you want to condone on this wiki? Please reconsider.

For me (and actually, for the German constitution as well), "dignity" is one of the unalienable human rights. In fact, our constitution says that no matter what a human (any human on earth) does, he does have dignity, and that means that everybody deserves respect. It applies everywhere. Please understand that I am not lawyering; my intent in quoting that is to show that such a policy, if it existed, would violate some fundamental norms of civilized behaviour.

Dignity has not always been understood to be such a fundamental right; that's why most of the older bills of right don't have it. But the present German constitution (and, I assume, the UDHR as well) were written in the light of the Nazi regime, which justified incredible atrocities against the Jews with "they deserved it" (by alledgedly plotting Germany's downfall) and communists, who'd been portrayed as subhuman by German propaganda. It means that most arguments that go "we treat you worse than everybody else because you deserve it" is ill-founded.

Of course specific behavour can net you specific consequences; that is what law is all about. But what you're implying in unblocking Auron is that if you post an opinion on a wiki talk page, you can be flamed without consequences, and you have no way to know before you post that this will happen to you. I can't see how we can attract decent people to this wiki with policy like this.

Auron posts once in a blue moon these days and probably won't even feel the three days. Nevertheless, you have chosen to unblock Auron without discussing this with me first, although most other wiki admins (and many users both new and old) have been online , probably noticed that before you did, and didn't comment on it (you may have received comments in private, I don't know). Overruling me this way means I hand in my badge and take a long wikibreak if you ever do this again. Yes, I am that pissed. --◄mendel► 10:22, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

Then let me save you the trouble. (T/C) 10:55, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

Entropy, you are biased when it comes to Auron. Just an observation. --Macros 11:03, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

Administrators can counteract other administrators, if they feel it prudent. An erroneous ban can be lifted. An erroneous delete can be restored. Typically, only a message on the talk page explaining the reason why such a countermeasure is prudent is expected in such a case. The "reverted" administrator is expected to oblige the revert, and should not reinstitute their action without discussing it with the "reverting" administrator.

Again, though this may seem a fairly chaotic governing system, it works extremely well in context of the wiki. An appointment to administrator is not something done lightly. The administrators are a cohesive team, and the mutual respect they share for another, even when disagreeing, is second to only the respect and care they have for the GuildWiki itself.

So I heard it's impossible to know Auron without being biased one way or the other. That is all. (T/C) 11:10, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but immediately quoting the admin policy seems like a cop-out response and just a way of saying "I have more power than you so I can disregard your arguments." While this may be true, it only serves to piss people off and drive away this wiki's already small userbase. --Macros 11:16, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

It is better than writing something scathing and inappropriate about an obvious disconnect with reality, don't you think? (Oops.) The admin policy applies equally to all administrators, anyway - it has nothing to do with me being a bureaucrat. As to driving away users: If you're going to rage over something as petty as this, then by all means, go. Because I can assure you I would do the same thing given another chance. I find it highly amusing that things have come to such a state that by exercising the powers granted by both the letter and spirit of our admin policy, in a perfectly ordinary manner, I can cause people to quit the wiki. (T/C) 11:32, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

I'm not going to rage, however, I am going to bed after I post this, so don't expect a reply from me for a while. I just seem to recall some sort of guideline that said admins shouldn't exercise their powers in a dispute they are personally involved with. Karlos got a talking to for that several times, I believe. And, Entropy, I think you are biased when it comes to disputes that involve Auron. This is the basis of my reasoning. Maybe that guideline no longer applies. Maybe it should. --Macros 11:54, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

I wouldn't have blocked auron for two reasons. One, he was right, which is pretty important to me when it comes to fucking retards discussing balance. Two, he very rarely posts so it actually serves np purpose. Since he's got two previous blocks that I remember for NPA, 3 days would actually seem too low if you were going to block. ZZZZZZZZZ. Lord of all tyria 12:19, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

When it comes to 'biased' aren't all admins 'biased' when it is about other admins/'noticable' users ? IMHO, shouting 'biased' isn't doing that much good in most of the admin discussions. Mendel & Entropy, please, take a step back, count to ten. Is this really worth fighting for. Both of you have my respect, I will not state who is wrong or right about this and I think it is a shame that it comes to this. Mendel, you unblocked without informing other admins. Entropy has problems not being consulted about it. So, someone is agitated, just say 'I'm sorry, next time I think about it before doing such action' and discuss the matter the way it should be done in the first place. NOT by making this discussion bigger then it deserves to be -- -- ( talk ) 12:28, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

Mendel, you unblocked without informing other admins. Huh? You got something wrong there. --◄mendel► 12:43, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

It is true that generally, admins ought to avoid dealing with situations where they are personally involved, because as much as we try it's very hard to remove all traces of personal bias from affecting the decision. However, if you are going to apply that logic to me, then I'll counter by saying Mendel is biased in the opposite direction. Mendel is free to counter this by saying he acknowledged the bias and went through with the action regardless after a thorough examination of the facts; and that leaves me free to say that I did the same. (Unlike game balance and power creep, bias counters bias.)

I may or may not be putting words in your mouth/abusing hyperbole with the following statement: If I am so biased that every decision I make with regards to Auron is bound to be in his defense, why isn't he a bureaucrat or sysop anymore? What does that say about condoning such-and-such style of discussion?

@Merty...We try, we really do, not to let such rank/visibility differences influence our judgments, but we're not perfect. I also appreciate your concern in this matter, but unfortunately, a storm like this was almost inevitable to break out eventually. By which I mean to say, this is a conflict much deeper than you can understand. So if it seems like it is completely blown out of proportion, you are correct - there are other underlying issues. And while I am sorry that it creates wikidrama to manifest in this way, I do not feel sorry for my actions. (T/C) 12:48, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

Mendel is free to counter this: my actual counter is that I did ask for a second opinion, which I received. I also think Merty can understand the deeper conflict, and if he does not, he is free to ask, and I will answer as best I can. --◄mendel► 13:00, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

(Reset indent) "As to driving away users: If you're going to rage over something as petty as this, then by all means, go."

I'm not the one who raged; I didn't quit the wiki over the ban revert, precisely because there was the chance I'd not understood something well enough, and pointing out that the policy is "revert ban, then discuss" makes me reconsider. Did I get a chance to reconsider? Basically, I feel demoted because of a single post I wrote that expressed a feeling you didn't like; it wasn't even a wiki action that was involved.

You get a special irony bonus because you unbanned Auron because you think he has right to say to Tenetke "I am pissed at your stupidity", but you demote me over saying "I am pissed at your admin action".

I took / am still taking the wikibreak over what I think is an unfair demotion, because I know standing up for yourself in that state of mind is not a good idea. I seem to think that posting these paragraphs is a good idea; partially because I think having others stand up for me without taking a stand myself is not something I like to do. (Thank you!)

We'll see how that goes. A slightly different version was also mailed to Entropy. --◄mendel► 12:43, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

"Overruling me this way means I hand in my badge and take a long wikibreak if you ever do this again."

Unless I'm highly deficient in clue today, you were threatening to resign if I ever countered you on an administrative action again. Knowing that this was an all-but-complete certainty, I saved the drama by cutting to the chase. Was I wrong in that? (You of all people I would expect to know the policies best, even better than myself; since you actually bothered to read them, even before being promoted... and you're one of the last people I would expect to retract[?] a prior statement because you did not thoroughly think it through first.)

I unbanned Auron because I do not believe he breached NPA or otherwise performed a bannable offense. Your threatening to ban him for it quite possibly provoked him to further hostilities, in addition to it being on his talkpage (semantics difference, but there is one), and thus I still refrain from considering ban-worthy at that point. A warning I would have given, most likely.

If I tell someone that their logic is terrible, that is not a personal attack. That is all. It is certainly not a bannable offense by any stretch of the policy. What I take offense with is not the block in and of itself (since, after all, admin discretion = can ban anyone at any time for anything); but rather that you would categorize it as an NPA. "asshattery", "being a dick", etc. would have been much more acceptable. Why do I consider this a problem? Because if the block stands, it expands the scope of NPA to cover anything which could be construed as a personal attack; it puts in a slippery slope notion that "one must be courteous and nice in discussion" or be subject to administrative action.

Slight digression - my summary for the unblock is another (smaller) issue, alluded to by Loat above - the block really doesn't solve any problems. Auron posts here very rarely, and thus a block of any appreciable length would have to be for weeks/months. (Which would also be way out of proportion for an NPA; not to mention prior violations are like a year+ old.) Remember the discussion about "block doctrine"? A block is a tool which is to be used preventatively, not punitively. In this case, it seems very clear to me that Auron wasn't on an NPA spree or any crap like that, and thus the block is meaningless; the point would have been to "stop" him, but he did that by himself, and would have done so regardless of the block in any case. You also know as well as I that a simple block won't make him change his discussion style, so "pre-emptive prevention" is also out of the question. Therefore, the block becomes punitive, to serve the interest of..."justice", I suppose... "The user broke policy and so he should be banned." And that is contrary to how the law works on this wiki. (T/C) 13:33, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

I forgot that you're on the preventative side of the doctrine now; when I look back on the thread on the admin noticeboard I only see that you're like "it depends". Anyway, Auron had attacked a user (10:24), got warned (12:41), insulted the same user again and started insulting me (13:16), so I blocked him (15:41) to prevent further abuse. (I would've blocked sooner, but I waited for a second opinion because of suspected bias on my part.) You unblocked 15 hours later.

"a simple block won't make him change his discussion style": look back on what happened around the time of his first, failed RfA; I think it was about that time he got blocked, and he was on better behaviour up to the other RfA at least. I couldn't tell that he would stop by himself, but you know him better, so I believe you in that respect, and the evidence is in your favor. For long block lengths, there is no other way than to start short and work up, and like you, I disregarded the old blocks.

It's not about being courteous and nice in discussion; there was no discussion as there was no logical reasoning of any kind in Auron's post; it's about going to the talkpage of an editor that you don't agree with (heck , that probably the majority of readers doesn't agree with) and telling them to stop posting. You like to say the wiki's not about majorities, the wiki is about arguments and reason; that means we protect minorities even if we think they're wrong because if we don't, the minorities who are right stop posting. It's an attempt to intimidate and bully an editor he didn't agree with, and if GW:NPA doesn't cover that, it bloody well should. --◄mendel► 21:21, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

Postscriptum: About the warning: I seem to recall that users are usually warned on their talkpages; I tried to be non-aggressive, yet draw a firm line. If you think I worded that badly, please explain. Should I have omitted "and you will be banned next time" and just have followed through with the ban when it happened again?

At the time I wrote my reply on Tenetke's page, I still thought (like you do) that it was just a case of "asshattery", but rethinking it and examining the structure and context of Auron's post made me decide it was a personal attack indeed (see details above, "I'd let it pass..."). --◄mendel► 21:36, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

(EC) While I don't completely disagree with what Auron posted on Tenetke's talk, I feel that he was unnecessarily rude and condescending which, at this point, are basically Auron trademarks. Don't get me wrong, I like and respect Auron, but he doesn't seem to understand the difference between being "blunt" and just outright being a jackass (because there is indeed a difference). Furthermore, his response to mendel, while perhaps somewhat provoked, was way out of line.

One of my largest concerns in this issue is that Auron's attitude toward Tenetke (ur bad, gtfo *trolls off wiki*) is exactly the attitude that has turned PvX into the cesspit of trolling and retardedness it is today. Letting this slide is a step in a direction I'm not sure you want GuildWiki to take. Even if banning Auron doesn't solve any of the problems with Auron (which I'm fully aware it won't), it sends a message to other would-be trolls that we don't appreciate that kind of behavior. ¬ Wizårdbõÿ777(talk) 13:35, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

I'd like to reiterate that blocks aren't meant to be punitive. By extention, that means you do not use them to "send a message". (before anyone digs through the logs on here or some other wiki to find a counterexample, I say this: those sysops were doin it wrong, including me.) I also find the argument somewhat fallacious, Wizard, that "if we let Auron go free, that will make it seem okay to other would-be trolls". This is common argument used in defense of punitive bans being a good thing - "it helps to deter vandals". But it is also unproven and stems from reaction out of fear for what may happen. It is the same line of thought which leads one to protect various obscure-but-widely-used templates on the wiki because a clever vandal *might* decide to mess with them. That was a wrong thing to do. Situations are to be dealt with on a case-by-case basis; whenever a vandal/new user/etc. points to a past precedent and says "But look what you did there, I did the same thing, so I should be treated the same!" that is not a valid argument because of what we call discretion. (Not to mention that extenuating circumstances change over time.) Discretion defies logic, but it is the way we run things here. It is contrary to real life, because in real life, claiming discretion gets you into trouble very quickly; Wikis just don't operate like real life. The spirit of the law trumps the letter, and common practice/consensus trumps both... not so in real life. On wikis, we take intent into consideration, and whether or not the actual "victim" was "harmed"... etc etc.

Tl;dr: would-be trolls aren't Auron, and they will be treated individually regardless of the outcome of this decision. (T/C) 13:58, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

related comments

1 comment moved from below:

I didn't want to become involved, but I've followed this argument. There's most likely more to it that seen here, as I think Entropy said, but personally, I believe the ban was just. Stating someone is an idiot on that user's talkpage, completely out of context IS imho a personal attack, even though his choice of words made it seem much less worse than it actually was. Even when Mendel gave him a warning he simply continued to insult Tenetke, making it even worse than it already was. [..] (btw, entropy, this is not critisism on your acts, but merely my observations and opinion. I won't say that any of you acted wrong, because I don't think I have seen the entire argument, only the part about auron insulting Tenetke).--El_Nazgir 08:47, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

Apology to Entropy

Concerning the footnote of this edit, I was completely in the wrong; I had no right to be angry about the way you handled the unblocking, since you were following established GuildWiki policy; and it was unprofessional of me to bring my anger to the wiki in this way. It will not happen again. --◄mendel► 19:51, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

Opinion please Mendel

How're we doing? Be honest. -->Suicidal Tendencie 23:26, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Some good ideas, some not so good. Get on irc if you want details. --◄mendel► 23:36, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

So anyway, who can't tell "men" from "man?" :P RoseOfKali 04:59, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

Pan likes to address people by syllables of their name - and mine isn't mandel. ;-) --◄mendel► 10:22, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

I... can't... I followed a link from someone's page and it wouldn't let me, saying it had expired... it was a while ago. Sorry. -->Suicidal Tendencie 10:10, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

What are you talking about? o.O --◄mendel► 10:22, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

You forget I'm a noob... irc means nothing to me tbh (e.g. no clue how to get it... the vaguest of ideas as to what it is) Like MSN? -->Suicidal Tendencie 10:31, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

Indenting does matter - it looked as if you replied to Rose. :-P Irc works like MSN, only the other way around: with MSN, you chat with single users first, and invite them if you want a group chat. With irc, you generally join the group, and can then chat with individual users (although it can be used like an instant messenger, and indeed many open-source messengers can connect to irc). But yeah, the link for browser-based irc on our page is not working (but hopefully will again in February).

Go to http://www.mibbit.com/chat/ , wait for the page to load completely, where it says IRC: Mibbit webirc, change that to Gamesurge Webirc, edit the nick if you like, and do change the channel from #mibbit to #gwiki. Click Go and wait. Type "Hello" in the box at the bottom and wait (could be 15 minutes before somebody notices (sometimes it takes hours), but everbody in the list on the right will see what you wrote eventually, unless they disconnect first). So just keep the chat window open and check back from time to time. Using a dedicated irc program (or even the Chatzilla firefox plugin) is better than mibbit, so you ought to consider installing that if you intend to use irc regularly. --◄mendel► 10:55, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

Wtf are you doing? >.> (T/C) 06:35, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

Triggering one of the biggest spamstorms in recent wiki history, apparently (and inadvertantly). I'm extremely proud that the participant list reads like a "wiki who-is-who". --◄mendel► 10:22, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

SPAMSPAMSPAMSPAM oh, sorry... everyone was doing it, I just wanted to be popular! -->Suicidal Tendencie 10:31, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

So if I understand correctly, this is an open invitation to vandalize your page any way I see fit? (T/C) 10:55, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

Well he has been everything from a kitten to a baby eater, so go ahead :P Silver Sunlight (T/C) 14:00, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

Hehehe... the more kinky it is, the longer it will stay up... I'm mature... -->Suicidal Tendencie 14:41, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

Wait... Mendel... can we do ANYTHING? -->Suicidal Tendencie 14:45, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

Dude, liek, we needz you here.... I needz you. plz don't leave :-( Arnout aka The Emperors Angel 17:02, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

Arnout.. who's leaving? -->Suicidal Tendencie 17:46, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

He probably thought the delete tag was legitimate. It's okay Arnout, mendel's not going anywhere. 17:47, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

Seriously... this is unjust. My op. Of no importance. Unjust. --Alc ^^ 18:42, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

Arnout, Alc, everybody, I thank you for your support. Don't be sad. Go have some fun vandalizing my userpage, the opportunity won't last forever. --◄mendel► 00:33, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

A part of the following comment was moved up a section. ◄mendel►

And another thing, I believe vandalising someones userpage, even when he/she asked for it, very, very rude towards that person, even if he/she can just make a rollback or copy the original content back on it. --El_Nazgir 08:47, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

El Nazgir, I've enjoyed most if not all of these vandalisms, and don't think they've been rude at all much. :-) --◄El Mend► 08:59, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

Mendel's evil plan

I can see where this vandalism is going. It's like a trap. Once it's over you will go through the history and block us all for vandalism! Silver Sunlight (T/C) 02:00, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

Except that he can't anymore! Ohhh so mean 02:01, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

Everybody believes now that the page is protected, though, so no more vandalism... ;-P --◄mendel► 08:27, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

enoguh vandal for you? Arnout aka The Emperors Angel 10:24, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

Some kinda reverse psychology at work?--Alc ^^ 11:55, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

I can't keep up with the politics >_< Silver Sunlight (T/C) 14:04, 25 January 2009 (UTC)