Talk: Blastedt/Archive C

Archives

A
B
C

D

Discussion

unball...? what do you mean?(since you unfavoured my build, it HAS to mean something)Drick10 08:45, 21 January 2007 (CST)

Sorry for not cluing you in, its about my build, [Build:D/W Alone With the Reaper]

Kindly respond on the Disscusion page. thank you.Drick10 08:45, 21 January 2007 (CST)

As in, move about and not be near eachother for YAA. —Blastedt— 08:46, 21 January 2007 (CST)

yes.. did you even test my build? or did you just shun it because of its skill-set?(no offense meant here) Drick10 09:08, 21 January 2007 (CST)

Testing isn't required. I don't have a warrior that far with that many skillz even though —Blastedt— 09:13, 21 January 2007 (CST)

You mean you cant just unfavour someother person's build just like that? with no reason what soever or explaination? This means alot to me, and i dont appreciate people just unfavouring my build for no reason... Drick10 09:18, 21 January 2007 (CST)

I gave a reason, and it already had 3 unfavored votes lol. —Blastedt— 09:19, 21 January 2007 (CST)

I'm waiting for their replies.... just want to find out why, and what i can do. if you have no other reason, kindly remove your vote.. its depressing, really. Drick10 09:22, 21 January 2007 (CST)

Yeah, I have two unfavored builds too. QQ —Blastedt— 09:22, 21 January 2007 (CST)\

i think theres some misconception, YAA is supposed to have enemies that are not nearby (which is 1/8th* of aggro bubble) to activate. did you mean that? Drick10 09:32, 21 January 2007 (CST)

Yes, and that they are usually too lazy to move that far away. QQ —Blastedt— 09:34, 21 January 2007 (CST)

And you would think you, as a user would have the common sense not to use it on them?(Not meant as a insult Drick10 09:38, 21 January 2007 (CST)

Your build says your target is spellcasters. QQ, this discussion is over. —Blastedt— 09:41, 21 January 2007 (CST)

Ah, whatever you say...i wont take it to heart..Drick10 09:44, 21 January 2007 (CST)

Warning

Such actions as you displayed in [Build_talk:Mo/E_Glyph_Shield_of_Regen] will result in a ban on your next offense. Please act mature and respect other users. — Gares 18:20, 20 January 2007 (CST)

? I didn't really have a name for there, so I just put in New Page... Sorry...—Blastedt— 18:30, 20 January 2007 (CST)

Also, the /point /laugh is my generic unfavored vote of the day, sorry. it had nothing to do with the name... —Blastedt— 18:45, 20 January 2007 (CST)

Boxes

ZOMGLOL XD Entropy 20:04, 20 January 2007 (CST)

I win. —Blastedt— 20:04, 20 January 2007 (CST)

And I dind't steal a single one of them. —Blastedt— 20:05, 20 January 2007 (CST)

Box King

This user has honorably won the "Most Userboxes" competition.

Entropy 20:07, 20 January 2007 (CST)

I heard they're writing a new children's book, "Blastedt and the Night of 100 Userboxes". Entropy 20:09, 20 January 2007 (CST)

everyone support my campaign now. lololololol link in the header —Blastedt— 20:10, 20 January 2007 (CST)

Heres the userbox:

This user supports Blastedt's campaign and will not use his numerous userboxes.

Oh, thats what [[Image:QuestIconThumb.png]] I thought it was plaintext lol. —Blastedt— 20:12, 20 January 2007 (CST)

I'm a supporter. Entropy 20:13, 20 January 2007 (CST)

KK :D —Blastedt— 20:13, 20 January 2007 (CST)

Me too (adds box) :D--Blade (talk|contribs) 20:50, 20 January 2007 (CST)

Yay! Although, my form of the box looks somewhat better, and there are 101 boxes now entropy :) —Blastedt— 20:52, 20 January 2007 (CST)

Now everyone should use {{User:Blastedt/Campaign/Userbox}} with no subst so I can update globally. —Blastedt— 20:55, 20 January 2007 (CST)

Clever. Duly noted and done. Entropy 20:57, 20 January 2007 (CST)

Kay, thanks. —Blastedt— 20:58, 20 January 2007 (CST)

I'll beat you w/o doin that.--Hellbringer(talk|contribs) 21:10, 20 January 2007

Yours aren't much more creative tbh -.- Entropy 21:05, 20 January 2007 (CST)

tbh? Anyways, hellbring, you have 41. Nowhere near my massive 101 —Blastedt— 21:07, 20 January 2007 (CST)

"To Be Honest", gee and I thought I didn't get out enough. ;) Entropy 21:09, 20 January 2007 (CST)

And what does "afaik" mean? —Blastedt— 21:10, 20 January 2007 (CST)

"As Far As I Know" Entropy 21:11, 20 January 2007 (CST)

And "lol"? —Blastedt— 21:12, 20 January 2007 (CST)

"Laugh Out Loud" You know all these already, though, stop kidding me :) Entropy 21:13, 20 January 2007 (CST)

I didn't know afaik and tbh though. —Blastedt— 21:15, 20 January 2007 (CST)

There is no ORIGINALITY IN THE USERBOXES. Ours actually are more originale than yalls. After the second one ur originality died.

I win anyway. Take mine off your page. —Blastedt— 21:54, 20 January 2007 (CST)

Yours are not any more original. At least we worked harder than you'all. Entropy 21:56, 20 January 2007 (CST)

lol, look at how skinny this column has gotten!

well, anyway, I don't know whether to congratulate you (on the tons of userboxes) or shoot you in the face for making my eyes bleed (with all of the same userboxes with different numbers >< ) XD --Cynn 00:48, 26 January 2007 (CST)

Gotta go, bed

May the legacy live overnight. —Blastedt— 21:43, 20 January 2007 (CST)

PLEASE DO NOT REVERT EARNEST HARD WORK ON A WHIM

Hello. I have just spent the last few hours testing The Hero's Challenge quest and you have reverted INSTANTLY! Please read the Discussion page for our talk on the matter - I am a tad annoyed about this as I have just proved the requirements... -- Joseph C 10:16, 21 January 2007 (CST)

..................................................................my monk did it just by changing his second prof a week ago. —Blastedt— 10:17, 21 January 2007 (CST)

and where was he created, and what time? the discussion page shows there could be two different requirements depending on if created after an update... Perhaps it would be a better idea if we have it proved both, to insert both on main page as an either/or section in requirements. Joseph C

Obviously created in tyria. —Blastedt— 10:22, 21 January 2007 (CST)

Yes, but if you read discussion in full, you will see that an update occurred which affects the requirements, depending on the time the character was created.' So it appears that we may both be correct depending on this. Understand what I am explaining? Joseph C 10:25, 21 January 2007 (CST)

hi

dnd much :/ — Skuld 17:13, 21 January 2007 (CST)

oopsies :P —Blastedt— 18:58, 21 January 2007 (CST)

Reverts

Don't be so quick to try and jump on somebody, if you don't know their intentions give it a minute. --FireFox 19:06, 26 January 2007 (CST)

.......ok..........—Blastedt— 19:07, 26 January 2007 (CST)

Please see my comments on User_talk:Corsaire re violations by both parties of GW:1RV. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 13:05, 27 January 2007 (CST)

Vandals

Damn man, you're too fast for me today. I was gonna catch those three but got into edit conflicts with you. :) Entropy 15:04, 27 January 2007 (CST)

lol —Blastedt— 15:05, 27 January 2007 (CST)

Just a thought

What was the reasoning of the vote. You had it set as sensible vote, whereas only reasoning was the two skills, which at the time skuld was agreeing with me.--Sneakysmith12 17:19, 28 January 2007 (CST)

I don't need ot explain my damn reasons, too bored to do so. —Blastedt— 17:20, 28 January 2007 (CST)

This is not good Blastedt.. I recommend you put effort in, else do not participate. — Skuld 17:24, 28 January 2007 (CST)

:( And I've told him that things like that have been unfavored, and I don't really know how to explain it. —Blastedt— 17:25, 28 January 2007 (CST)

What? Dig up the links, cite the reasons — Skuld 17:27, 28 January 2007 (CST)

*Cries* —Blastedt— 17:28, 28 January 2007 (CST)

Thank you Skuld. I kinda like having some support there.--Sneakysmith12 17:51, 28 January 2007 (CST) YAY remeberd signing thing.

Show/Hide

You don't have one for your spoiler tag. Phail! — Rapta (talk|contribs) 18:41, 29 January 2007 (CST)

KK —Blastedt— 18:42, 29 January 2007 (CST)

Now I do, and I've tried the navigation, it doesnt work, so don't ask :P —Blastedt— 18:45, 29 January 2007 (CST)

Some Discretion Wouldn't Hurt

You know, making openly harrassing and sarcastic remarks like the ones you left in [Build talk:A/Me DB Nuker] are completely un-called for and come extremely close to violating GW:YOU. As an active contributor to the wiki, I expect a little bit more from you than your average one-shot pop in and pop out flamer that comes in to the wiki from time to time. I'm asking you to behave like a respectable member of this community from another contributor's frame of reference. I know I have my moments as well but I feel it as my duty to call you out on this particular one. I know you're better than that. — Jyro X 16:17, 30 January 2007 (CST)

:(—Blastedt— 16:20, 30 January 1999 (CST)

And I was harrasing the build, not the author! —Blastedt— 16:20, 30 January 2007 (CST)

Please rethink your attitude, you're just being a dick.. — Skuld 09:52, 31 January 2007 (CST)

Sowry skuldy :( —Blastedt 15:04, 31 January 2007 (CST)

PATHETIC UNDERLING

This user is a pathetic underling.

—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Nog64 (contribs) .

If it's really that important to you...

Then you post the build. -.- Or one similar to it, I don't care. It just frustrated me when people didn't see the point of the build, nor did they try it before they modified it with things that I wholly felt a bad change. If I were to post a build on here I'd want it to be known I did it, and modifications that I think degrade the build from how I designed it just got frustrating. That, and the fact that multiple people got mad at me for posting my unique build, made me remove it from it's standing. If someone else wants to design a build similar to it they may be my guest, I'll probably re-establish it later, if nobody else posts a similar build. Honestly since nobody seemed to care I didn't think it was a big deal. Sure, if you really care about it being there that much, un-blank what I did. let them do as they will, I'll just end up figuring out another build later. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Darkkingddd (contribs) .

^^ Told you there was no reason to keep it up there.

It seems like people just don't grasp how well the build works, since I've seen firsthand by using the original build I posted in AB battles, Kurzick side, for ~8 hours straight or so, and I happen to know that if you use it properly it can be quite potent, but I removed it because nobody here at GuildWiki can understand why certain skills are used, how to use it, and apparently just can't see how it would possibly work at all. That is mostly why I removed it, I saved the time of people voting it down and eventually to be deleted anyway. ^-^ Not that I care, I honestly prefer nobody using my build but me, it makes me feel special.. That's also partially why I removed it, if people DID like it then many people would use it, and if they didn't, and they don't, it'll be deleted soon anyway. ^^ Anyway... That was all I had to say. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Darkkingddd (contribs) .

Recentchanges, Main Page, + Google Pagerank ^TM

Rather surpirsingly, those with a google pagerank on their firefox toolbar can see googles importance rating of pages. go to recent changes, look at the bar and press Main Page. THE BAR GOES DOWN! RECENT CHANGES IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN THE MAIN PAGE LOLOLOLOL. On a seemingly related topic, my userpage is 1/10 of the importance bar. —Blastedt 15:24, 1 February 2007 (CST)

Userboxes and Categories

This has been annoying me for awhile now, but could you fix your userboxes so as to not have red categories at the bottom of your userpage? The problem is because you use the "Babelbox" template to make non-Babel uesrboxes. Thanks. Entropy 16:45, 1 February 2007 (CST)

I ws noob :P —Blastedt— 16:47, 1 February 2007 (CST)

Cheers, thanks ;) Entropy 16:54, 1 February 2007 (CST)

:P—Blastedt— 16:55, 1 February 2007 (CST)

warning

Blastedt,
I placed a warning to all on Skulds page, but wanted to emphasize it here. Your comment to TheDrifter was not acceptable. "bleep"ing out comments does not make them less offensive. While I understand that you consider Skuld a friend, do not allow your emotions to influence what you say. Further posts of that type can be viewed as disruptive or personal attacks, and result in administrative action. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 20:24, 1 February 2007 (CST)

I don't really care anymore, without skuld this will become largely meaningless. You know what happened to my old clan? I joined, I soon become to regard everyone as friends. An old veteran left the guild. The leader had IP problems. Next, it split in two as one faction of admins split the entire clan. All I had ever known of it disappeared, never to reappear. Here lies the first step for guildwiki — Skuld, the veteran, has left. I wonder which admin will spearhead the split of rulings. —Blastedt— 20:33, 1 February 2007 (CST)

He's not gone forever. Entropy 20:49, 1 February 2007 (CST)

Cheer up dude... not like he's dead. I'm sure he'll be back before you know it :-) --Lania Elderfire 21:26, 1 February 2007 (CST)

Nope. Note the whole thing with Stabber... that didn't kill the wiki. Note the list of admininstrators who no longer actually administer the wiki. Note the fact that the people who actually own the server have essentially 0 contact with the community. — 130.58 (talk) 21:46, 1 February 2007 (CST)

Not to mention that Skuld wasn't "the veteran"... Not really sure where you got that. — Jyro X 22:08, 1 February 2007 (CST)

Not that sentimental here, life goes on, even without some admins/beloved users. Cheer up --SigmA 12:33, 2 February 2007 (CST)

Broken Sarcasm Meter

That was funny. I think I'll have to keep it around in my "Funny Internet Occurances" .txt document. Entropy 20:49, 1 February 2007 (CST)

Comments About Your Leaving

Well, I'm not really sure where you come off saying that everyone doesn't know Tanaric. Almost everyone I've met on Wiki knows his name and has interacted with him on one point or another. If you confine yourself to only one or two areas of the wiki (such as you did), no you're not going to know most of the people (especially the ones dealing with most of the beaurocracy [sp?]). You're a regular contributor and haven't made any HUGE contributions that I've seen (no offense intended honestly) so I can't say that a lot of people will miss you because you only allowed a select few to get to know you. And half of those aren't active on the wiki anymore. I never really interacted with you except on a couple of occasions, so I can't pass any judgment on your character or personality (not that I would even if I did know you better), but I do hope that you will one day return to this wiki and mature enough to let things that don't concern you go and not let them keep you from contributing to a community of over 3 million Guild Wars players instead of just letting 1 or 3 people (that you could easily just go without interacting with as you already had) keep you from doing it. Have a nice break. — Jyro X 15:47, 2 February 2007 (CST)

Blastedt was a kid it was obvious, as for skuld he will be missed but it was his choice to leave. --FireFox 08:22, 3 February 2007 (CST)

This is really..pathetic, I'm sorry to say it, but life goes on you know. You just can't deny the facts, and I'd say keep on contributing to guildwiki. You're a fine member and a worthy contributor. But if you leave, I'll hope to see you again sometime here on the wiki. --SigmA 16:24, 3 February 2007 (CST)

I may stya for a little while, and it was a tad soon, but I'm not taking that down. —Blastedt— 21:30, 3 February 2007 (CST)

Deletion of my build

Well, as I knew would happen, It's been voted down, so I was just informing you so you can delete it or whatever, I won't blank my build, I'll keep using (my original build), but I won't blank it... Remove it, keep it, what have you. Just letting you know it's been successfully voted down, so you may remove it. ^-^

I'm not an admin, thanks for the misconception though ^.^' We onoly delete oif it's obviously a joke build, as inspiration can be found from the ashes, which is why we don't like people blanking builds to begin with. —Blastedt— 10:10, 4 February 2007 (CST)