GuildWiki

GuildWiki has been locked down: anonymous editing and account creation are disabled. Current registered users are unaffected. Leave any comments on the Community Portal.

READ MORE

GuildWiki
mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
 
Line 4: Line 4:
 
:::Ok thats done I just wanted it off "public" view.--[[User:Omega fury|Omega fury]] 14:09, 8 March 2007 (CST)
 
:::Ok thats done I just wanted it off "public" view.--[[User:Omega fury|Omega fury]] 14:09, 8 March 2007 (CST)
   
  +
==Image Titling==
Omega, your image Image:Gw015.jpg is too generically titled. If you could re-upload that image with a more descriptive name, by following the directions for image naming at [[GW:IMAGE#Image titles and file names]], it would be much appreciated. --[[User:Albinobird]][[Image:Albinobirdsigicon.JPG|Albinobird]] 00:11, 5 April 2007 (CDT)
+
Omega, your image Image:Gw015.jpg, Image:Gw014.jpg is too generically titled. If you could re-upload that image with a more descriptive name, by following the directions for image naming at [[GW:IMAGE#Image titles and file names]], it would be much appreciated. --[[User:Albinobird]][[Image:Albinobirdsigicon.JPG|Albinobird]] 00:11, 5 April 2007 (CDT)

Latest revision as of 05:12, 5 April 2007

Note: While blanking votes on a build is a violation of policy, a user's talk page can be cleaned up by that author - provided they don't distort the meaning of conversations that took place on their talk page. --- Barek (talkcontribs) - 12:16, 8 March 2007 (CST)

Ok I found the policy. Could you also revert Build talk:D/Me Midnight Scythe too. So that Solus's and my debate on Sand Shards is off. I read the policy on Clearing Debates in the case of vanity or spamming. I think it served its purpose.--Omega fury 13:40, 8 March 2007 (CST)
While he has the right to blank a conversation on their own talk page - you also have a right to preserve it elsewhere if that alternate location is appropriate to the contents of the discussion, and as long as the copied text isn't being spammed to multiple alternate locations, and as long as a note is included linking back to the page from where it was copied. Usually its best to preserve these sorts of things in your own namespace (ie: create a page like User talk:Omega fury/sand shards discussion or some such). But I believe that your insertion of the debate text into that build does follow those criteria in this case. --- Barek (talkcontribs) - 13:57, 8 March 2007 (CST)
Ok thats done I just wanted it off "public" view.--Omega fury 14:09, 8 March 2007 (CST)

Image Titling[]

Omega, your image Image:Gw015.jpg, Image:Gw014.jpg is too generically titled. If you could re-upload that image with a more descriptive name, by following the directions for image naming at GW:IMAGE#Image titles and file names, it would be much appreciated. --User:AlbinobirdAlbinobird 00:11, 5 April 2007 (CDT)