Talk: Queen Schmuck

Other's Ideas and Thoughts[]

Cheers, a fellow Dilbert fan! :) Entropy 19:48, 20 January 2007 (CST)

Ah yes, the Pointy Haired Boss is a known mob boss that should be avoided at all costs. The worst part of this boss is that it is not limited to a single profession, but is non-proficient in all. Known affects of being around this creature include:
*energy drain
*life drain
*inability to use skills
Rezoning is the only known way to get away from the effects of this boss. Queen Schmuck 01:34, 22 January 2007 (CST)

Flame the n00b, aka, my 1337 pwn u, aka, all your base are belong to us[]

1337 hax0r pwnage nooch nooch, n00b! Markh 01:12, 7 March 2007 (CST)

Link Test[]

(T/C)

Yep, link only shows up if they point to non-current page. Queen Schmuck 01:35, 17 February 2007 (CST)

Feedback on [Build:E/Mo Protection Prodigy][]

I appreciate the Dismiss Condition suggestion, it is indeed a great spell for the build and improved it significantly. If you could care to take another look, try it out, see what you think of it and perhaps offer your vote, it would be appreciated. Thank you. Ps: Nice to meet another Dilbert Fan, I read it daily. The newsletters and their (true) tales of "Induhviduals" also always crack me up. NightAngel 16:52, 13 March 2007 (CDT)

I might give that build a whirl. I don't PvP much (cept scrimmages within alliance), so not sure how well I can test it PvP. Since the build is stated as PvE though, after a few trips to the skill trainers, my E will try this out (when I get a chance). I don't currently have any fire +15/-1 weapon/offhands, but I have at least 5 most collectables, so I will have them soon (currently only have one +15/-1 inscription). I might also try it without the +15/-1 eq to see how well that works also. Queen Schmuck 17:03, 13 March 2007 (CDT)

Well, have fun, but it's too late now, Skuld has singlehandedly succeeded in destroying it. What a .... Sigh. Nm. He has way too many friends who follow him around and he doesn't take well to new ways of doing the same thing. NightAngel 17:16, 13 March 2007 (CDT)

Eh, just because a build is non-favored doesn't mean it can't work good for you. I've only voted on one build, and only because it was so terrible I had to try it out on some guildies for a good laugh (my good laugh, they didn't much like it being "tested" on them). Queen Schmuck 17:30, 13 March 2007 (CDT)

Contest[]

Creativity:7
Viability: 7
Presence: 7
Unusibility of Skill: 7
Total: 28/40

Reasoning:

Creativity: Pretty standard farming build other than elite. Picked a standard choice to farm as well.
Viability: The morale boosts and no anti-farming code is tempting, but you're not fighting very challenging enemies. Limited in purpose (i.e., this won't work to well in FoW/UW).
Presence: Used to build adreniline and thus rather important, but not the life's blood of the build. Disabling of either attacks or mass enchantment stripping would hurt you more than disabling AP.
Skill: Picked a good skill to work with, as it's neither sucktacular nor used all the time.

So, you finished at the high end of the average. Good job.--Nog64 Talk 18:57, 6 April 2007 (CDT)

Thanks, was just curious. I knew the Solo from Zerris kicked the crap out of my build, but it does do what it is intended to do; collect runes with no major fancy footwork needed. Queen Schmuck 19:18, 6 April 2007 (CDT)

Rantway FTW![]

Moved a lot of grrrr to User:Queen Schmuck/Rantway FTW!. Queen Schmuck 05:45, 10 April 2007 (CDT)

Because of this, if ANet does not fix Soul Reaping by next week, then they are once and for all without-a-doubt proving they don't care about PvE at all, and to be honest, don't really care about their so-called PvP life giving customers either (since nerf didn't fix PvP either). Queen Schmuck 17:19, 8 April 2007 (CDT)

i don't think anet can fix it now, the new tournament has started, and it might be seen as quite amiss if they mucked up a tourney cycle. they'll probably have to wait till eye is released and fix it then. --Honorable Sarah

23:51, 9 April 2007 (CDT)

Save the Cheerleader, Save the World!, er, I mean, Nerf the niche skill to unusable, save the PvP! *cough* Queen Schmuck 05:45, 10 April 2007 (CDT)

you need a rantful section[]

i love mine, very cathartic. --Honorable Sarah 23:54, 9 April 2007 (CDT)

*sigh*

Yes, I should make a rant area on something besides my user page's talk page. But now that I know about yours, I can just read it, nodding my head a lot (grr, I'm old too), then say

"Yep, that @$%^$%^%&$&&*$@$##$@#$# is the @#$@%$^ @#$@# @#$@$#%$ and that #@$#@!&*&^&^ @#%$&-head needs to @#$&^%^*% &^ $@#!$^%@$^."

After that, I sigh, feel better, and go about being on GuildWiki, but not playing GW, since I am still miffed about my Necro being half the toon he used to be (Olias is pissed too!). I'm also not too pleased with my warrior's stances, my Ritualist general unusefullness in PvE, and the fact that the Skill trainer in the guild hall sucks even more now that there are 3 set of skills he won't sell. Oh well, that is the way this game goes. I should have had a clue that it was, and forever will be, PvP centric, since the name of the game is Guild Wars (which is funny since guild battles limited to 16 ppl at same time, not epic wars). Seems I a little dense sometimes.

Houston FTW! (ok, hows about Kerrville?) Queen Schmuck 01:59, 10 April 2007 (CDT)

Ok, got my Rantway FTW! page up. Queen Schmuck 05:45, 10 April 2007 (CDT)

Hi[]

I tried to come up with a fair solution. I hate the glaring colours, he wants the box, so I removed the colour, everyone happy? Whats your encompassing solution? — Skuld 07:13, 13 April 2007 (CDT)

It is a talk page. That is the second time you mucked with it. Sounds like revert war to me. Queen Schmuck 07:16, 13 April 2007 (CDT)

Revert wars usually envolve reverting of some form. — Skuld 07:18, 13 April 2007 (CDT)

You know what you are doing. And I forgot, you had removed stuff 3x now. Queen Schmuck 07:22, 13 April 2007 (CDT)

It's ugly as hell, and serves *absolutely no purpose.* Taking the colors out is the least he could do. -Auron

07:29, 13 April 2007 (CDT)

So, people can't put stuff in talk pages? What are you saying here. Queen Schmuck 07:33, 13 April 2007 (CDT)

SO

WHuTs UP?

:D

— Skuld 07:37, 13 April 2007 (CDT)

Nevermind. I see this is a good'ol boys thing. Put it however you want it, I mean, it is a talk page for chrisake. Being a ex-admin here obviously allows breaking GW:1RV. This is also now bordering on GW:NPA. Continue if you must, you are digging your own hole. Queen Schmuck 07:40, 13 April 2007 (CDT)

What? Is posting on talk pages not allowed now? And whats my past got to do with anything? — Skuld 07:42, 13 April 2007 (CDT)

I don't think Skuld broke 1RV when he altered the appearance. He gave it nowiki tags, someone else removed them, so he altered the style of the box to be less garish, and then you replaced the template.

Regardless of the actions that Skuld has carried out, I don't really understand the purpose of the template, and it seems unnecessarily large to me, especially for a talk page. But on the other hand I don't think it violates any policies. <LordBiro>/<Talk> 07:51, 13 April 2007 (CDT)

LordBiro, no prob. I see S level = 15, so it makes perfect sense. If you feel that I went too far let me know. As a person that is old enough to be his father (+), I won't come down to his level. Queen Schmuck 13:14, 13 April 2007 (CDT)

Yeh... cause age is the only thing that determines how we act. -Auron

13:19, 13 April 2007 (CDT)

I'm telling on you. — Skuld 13:21, 13 April 2007 (CDT)

Thanks for proving my point. :S Queen Schmuck 16:10, 13 April 2007 (CDT)

Image copyright problem[]

Thank you for uploading the files listed below. GuildWiki takes copyright very seriously, and the images you have supplied are missing information on its copyright status. The images will be deleted after 7 days, unless the copyright status is determined for the license and the source of the images. Please review GuildWiki:Image use policy and add a copyright tag to their image description page.

Thank you for your cooperation.

The following is a list of files that need attention:

Image:Acceptbutton.jpg
Image:Rejectbutton.jpg

84.13.251.42 07:05, 3 May 2007 (CDT)

I was not the original uploader of what appears to be GW in-game images. I only removed the black background from (cleaned up) the images that already existed on the wiki. Delete them and remove refs from pages if you want, as the few pages that use them do not need to use them (no other quests use those images). Queen Schmuck 13:08, 5 May 2007 (CDT)

I know my facts, please check yours. Please refer to GuildWiki:Image attribution project Thank you for your cooperation 89.240.230.92 13:32, 5 May 2007 (CDT)

The facts are that you bugged nearly every person that uploaded an image here. Piss off. Queen Schmuck 13:33, 5 May 2007 (CDT)

Don't be a jerk dude.. — Skuld 13:34, 5 May 2007 (CDT)

Umm, guys watch your tones and language, were all friends here. the copyright issue is being fixed now, all images will have copyright information, including all screenshots. -- Xeon 13:38, 5 May 2007 (CDT)

Yes, which, to my knowledge, wasn't required when I made the edits. And since the guy admitted to posting from two separate class A's, I put the redirect on the page. Queen Schmuck 13:42, 5 May 2007 (CDT)

Skill box --> User skill box[]

The following pages in your userspace are using {{Skill box}}:

Because they are user-created skills, they should instead be using {{User skill box}}. Please update them to use the correct template. If they have not been changed in 5 days, they will be changed for you. —Dr Ishmael 03:50, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Done. It's been over a year from being here, and had forgotten how to Wikify stuff. It came back to me. Queen Schmuck 05:27, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Thank you! Bot ishmael 02:42, 15 May 2008 (UTC)