GuildWiki

GuildWiki has been locked down: anonymous editing and account creation are disabled. Current registered users are unaffected. Leave any comments on the Community Portal.

READ MORE

GuildWiki
Advertisement

No spam

:O -->Suicidal Tendencie Suicidal Tendencie Sig 11:56, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

FIRST! Arnout aka The Emperors Angel 12:43, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
Or are you? *mysterious music* -->Suicidal Tendencie Suicidal Tendencie Sig 12:44, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
Needz more SPAM! I am first right? Atleast its spam. Arnout aka The Emperors Angel 12:47, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
S
P
A
M -->Suicidal Tendencie Suicidal Tendencie Sig 12:48, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
SPAM, spam, I'm Spamming in the rain. All I want is Spam, All I do is trolling. Arnout aka The Emperors Angel 13:14, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
(EC)All you want is spam? I've never had it but don't imagine it would be that tasty. Consider chicken pie and/or cookies. -->Suicidal Tendencie Suicidal Tendencie Sig 13:16, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
Chicken pie? I dont think I know what you mean. In the Netherlands we dont have something like that. But I like cookies. Still the spamming bussiness is really cool. Your new talkpage is coming along just fine. Arnout aka The Emperors Angel 13:22, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

No Spam --TalkpageEl_Nazgir 14:46, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

Hm... I've a PvE with every primary

And can only afford one pair. And it's not going on my Monk.

Who gets the Chaos Gloves? :P I'm thinkin' Rit atm -->Suicidal Tendencie Suicidal Tendencie Sig 15:17, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

Ummm, take the char you play the most? logic?--TalkpageEl_Nazgir 16:49, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
Ummm, there isn't one? Obvious? -->Suicidal Tendencie Suicidal Tendencie Sig 16:52, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
Umm, Mesmers have the smallest chaos gloves, but they look best with monks? Opinion?--Alc ^^ 17:03, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
And it's not going on my Monk. ^ ^ Probably going on Rit tbh -->Suicidal Tendencie Suicidal Tendencie Sig 17:12, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
Take elite luxon armor with that. And dye green. :) --Alc ^^ 17:57, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
I do like Elite Luxon, but don't like lots of black... ash or whatever that is with chaos gloves :P I dunno, mebbe -->Suicidal Tendencie Suicidal Tendencie Sig 18:04, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
Noone; they suck <3 --- Ohaider! -- (contribs) (talk) 16:14, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
Meh, I like 'em. However I don't like the idea of spending all that money on a character which I, almost certainly, will play no more than I did before getting them. I'll probably spend the money on my Necro's armor. (I'd spend it on a BDS, but doing SoO with a mate constantly, one day I'll get the bloody thing...) -->Suicidal Tendencie Suicidal Tendencie Sig 16:16, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
And it'll turn out to be... Communing... RoseOfKali RoseOfKaliSIG 00:19, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
Hahah, go figure. I've been tagging along with an ex-guildie of mine, and we were joking about Communing BDS's too :) Communing is so hated. --- Ohaider! -- (contribs) (talk) 12:51, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
Those are the ones you give to your permasin. :) RoseOfKali RoseOfKaliSIG 15:23, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
Meh, rather to my ele; need a universal HCT/HSR staff :P Might as well look cool. --- Ohaider! -- (contribs) (talk) 15:32, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Hi

Stop staring at that widget and get the real RecentChanges. RoseOfKali RoseOfKaliSIG 00:15, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Yo

So I notice that there was a bit of a misunderstanding under us on IRC. So just wanted to clear stuff out :P That you won't get dragged into that Sims wiki thing. That was all right? Well hope to hear from you soon or something like that xD -- F4Sig † F1© 08:44, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

So... Warwick? -->Suicidal Tendencie Suicidal Tendencie Sig 16:47, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
Wat? —MaySig Warw/Wick 14:06, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
Was wondering who told him. -->Suicidal Tendencie Suicidal Tendencie Sig 14:14, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
Is there a problem then?? -- F4Sig † F1© 14:35, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
Well I did make it clear I was trying to lay low somewhat and did not want more people knowing my name as I've had wikidrama problems and, as I said, wanted to lay low.
The fact that you ignored my wishes is a problem for me, certainly, and I'm also bemused at the person who most likely told you. -->Suicidal Tendencie Suicidal Tendencie Sig 14:38, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
o_O" Right sry. Didn't know It was that of a deal. Just asked your name on IRC so I could find out what I did wrong but.... nvm then.... :( -- F4Sig † F1© 14:57, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
? Did wrong?
To be honest with you, besides going out of your way to ignore my wishes, I can't think of anything you did wrong. You spent hours on our IRC telling us all about the SimsWiki, which is more unfortunate than wrong.
I am rather amused that the greatest wrong in my eyes you committed worrying about something ultimately irrelevant. Annoying at the time, but soon forgotten. -->Suicidal Tendencie Suicidal Tendencie Sig 21:45, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

You knew this was coming...

Image copyright problem

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading your images. GuildWiki takes copyright very seriously, and the images you have supplied may be missing information on its copyright status. The images will be deleted after 7 days, unless the copyright status is determined for the license and the source of the images. Please review GuildWiki:Image use policy and add a copyright tag to their image description page.

Please browse through your images and correctly tag them. Further details can be found at GuildWiki:Image license guide.

Your uploaded image history can be found here.

Thank you for your cooperation. -- GuildWiki Community

The following images are missing copyright information:

  • Image:Suicidal Tendencie/Calm Mendel.gif
  • Image:Suicidal Tendencie/Violence.gif

--◄mendel► 19:24, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

No I did not, actually.
The "event" is over, so unless you would personally prefer I dig up the info for the /vandalized page, I'll stand by and allow them to be deleted. If you'd prefer them to stay, please let me know as soon as is convenient, as it will take some time. (I also took one of them, and no idea what to choose for that).
And I feel lazy now... I would do it myself, but to the best of my knowledge I don't have the right, minus a ban tag, which does not really reduce the effort on your part. And your section header disappoints me Mendel. -->Suicidal Tendencie Suicidal Tendencie Sig 21:41, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
Just looked at them, no I did not, thinking of something else.
Didn't take one, so no complication there. -->Suicidal Tendencie Suicidal Tendencie Sig 21:42, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

Guild Wars competitive xunlai tournament house

  • Making Changes

If you wish to make changes to your existing predictions, simply log in and go to your prediction page again. You March make any changes you wish to your top 8 prediction. Once you've finished editing your predictions click the Save My Predictions button. You can return to make changes to your predictions at any time before 15:00 GMT on March 28th for GvG & 15:00 GMT on March 29th for 1v1.

You March make? I presume that used to say may make and someone got confused... -->Suicidal Tendencie Suicidal Tendencie Sig 15:03, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Lol... Engrish.com I also don't have the "Save predictions" button. O_o I guess we're not allowed to save yet? RoseOfKali RoseOfKaliSIG 18:48, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
Yes you can, I have, perhaps you didn't log in again? :S
@ Mendel + Ishy, why do I keep ECing myself lately? =/ -->Suicidal Tendencie Suicidal Tendencie Sig 19:10, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
It's a pun on the month May, of course! --- Ohaider! -- (contribs) (talk) 19:10, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
Yes... not like ArenaNerf ever make mistakes... that IS a pun -->Suicidal Tendencie Suicidal Tendencie Sig 19:12, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
I logged in, you can't even get to there if you're not... RoseOfKali RoseOfKaliSIG 21:01, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Request to spam

Your request for spam has been audited, and a seal has been generated for your use

Rtampofdisapproval

RandomTime 18:39, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

pfft, I don't get the point
please observe the stamp immediately below my request, I can haz spamspam now -->Suicidal Tendencie Suicidal Tendencie Sig 18:55, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
Although I do like the pic in it =) -->Suicidal Tendencie Suicidal Tendencie Sig 19:05, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

Most what?

Scorpion Wire is by far one of the most skills in Guild Wars. RoseOfKali RoseOfKaliSIG 02:34, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

See User talk:Entropy About halfway down, labeled Funny Scorpion Wire Story.--Łô√ë Roar.îğá†ħŕášħ 02:51, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
Lol. RoseOfKali RoseOfKaliSIG 03:05, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
Thanx Giga :P -->Suicidal Tendencie Suicidal Tendencie Sig 16:45, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

uuuhm

I hope you realize that wasn't me. I wouldn't even do something that stupid when I'm drunk. Lol signing my own vandalizing, that would be pretty stupid. Arnout aka The Emperors Angel 18:02, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

Arnout, you need to think things through, mate. I changed it by looking at the edit history. The edit history shows who does what. =) -->Suicidal Tendencie Suicidal Tendencie Sig 18:55, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
Lol, and he didn't even do it right. :P Silly noob... vandalism is for pros!

RoseOfKali RoseOfKaliSIG 19:03, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

I can log out and use my IP adress. Arnout aka The Emperors Angel 80.60.239.64 19:04, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
LOL ^^ RoseOfKali RoseOfKaliSIG 19:06, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
1) Arnout, I believe you 2) Arnout: proxies 3) Rose - huh? -->Suicidal Tendencie Suicidal Tendencie Sig 19:11, 9 March 2009 (UTC) Mine, my credit, mine! :O
I laughed at Arnout still trying to prove that it wasn't his IP. :P "Silly rabbit... Trix are for kids?" And that's a painfully bright userbox, but you vandalized Mendels page "well," while the IP didn't even complete the link tags. RoseOfKali RoseOfKaliSIG 19:17, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
I know, but im running wiki from 3 differrent IP's. Arnout aka The Emperors Angel 08:10, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
I typed the comment above this on at school (the whole school has one IP adress I believe), and now I'm typing this at home. At home, I have 2 different IP's because our pc's aren't linked. Arnout aka The Emperors Angel 14:25, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
If you were logged out and signed, the signature would not show your name. --◄mendel► 22:25, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
Well, how do you know he didn't go as far as typing out his entire signature and timestamp (and missing the opening brackets, cus he's just such a crazy noob)? :P RoseOfKali RoseOfKaliSIG 05:37, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
Because the signature was already on the page (including teh timestamp), so he didn't need to type it? --◄mendel► 09:27, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
lol, this always happens here...
On my talk page we're talking about Arnout's IP's
On Mendel's talkpage, in the section about the new userbox I made, people were talking about Dr. Ishy and his wifey... we're organized :O -->Suicidal Tendencie Suicidal Tendencie Sig 13:15, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
Mendel: why are you trying to give a logical explanation to an irrational vandalism?
ST: Mendel edited my indent on YOUR talkpage... :*( RoseOfKali RoseOfKaliSIG 16:14, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
Because you asked.
Was that wrong? --◄mendel► 16:32, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
I didn't ask for a logical explanation, I didn't think there was one. :P
No, it was just somewhat related to my talkpage. RoseOfKali RoseOfKaliSIG 16:48, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

Suicidal talk

I like you. That's why I'm telling you something you won't be pleased to hear. The wiki isn't a "spoken" medium, but rather a written one. In chat, you write quickly, off the cuff, and what you write doesn't matter much outside the situation it was in. What you write on the wiki stays (potentially) forever; it will be read hours later by people who don't understand your situation, and they expect you to have spent the care on it that the written word deserves. This means that your tendency to reply quickly and emotionally is suicidal in the context of the wiki: people who assume you considered what you wrote will think you stupid and worse. (You're by far not the only person who does this, Rose has developed a very similar tendency, and there are others, too). Please heed the advice I just posted to GW:STUPID. --◄mendel► 15:01, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

The very first sentence interests me to no end, although I think that may be more suited to IRC. Please explain to me what talkpages are for, Mendel.
I want to make a point very clear: I am not being sarcastic. Frankly, as it stands, I have no clue why talkpages exist for users, and I always trust your guidance. -->Suicidal Tendencie Suicidal Tendencie Sig 15:43, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
Oh, and I did want to avoid saying this, but I am becoming increasingly angry at this site as an entity. I do consider what I say, to varying degrees. Perhaps others should consider the fact I welcomed him to this site, perhaps that I was the only one talking on his talkpage at least suggested I happen to know the man.
And, with that bit of common sense injected into the situation, perhaps people when deciding if they should post or not (and thereby, it would appear, deciding if I will be creating wiki drama or not) should bear that in mind. One user was posting on a fellow wik- user's talkpage. I REFUSE to accept the blame for other people deciding to join in. I was talking with my friend both here and on MSN. That other people decided to stick their unwanted noses in to the matter is NOT my decision, and thus I will NOT accept liability for it.
All I've been told here is that it's not a social networking site. I would beg people to ask themselves
1) What are user talk pages invariably used for at least half of the time and
2) Why is it just me that half the site turn their attentions to?
I apologize Mendel. I have let you down, I doubt that you like me, as you do not know me. You should consider my very strong feelings on this matter more as then you will understand me so much more.-->Suicidal Tendencie Suicidal Tendencie Sig 15:54, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
(edit conflict) Have you read the section on shouting matches on GW:STUPID? It should explain succinctly what talkpages are not for. And the answer to your question is exactly what I am hoping to write down on GW:STUPID -- that is my plan that Entropy and you claim is so hard to understand. ;-) --◄mendel► 15:56, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
I'm sorry, Mendel, but I consider your response to be totally inaccurate. I will not accept a proposed policy as evidence I have done something wrong. -->Suicidal Tendencie Suicidal Tendencie Sig 16:06, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
This is a wiki. People can stick their noses wherever they damn well please. How were we to know that you weren't simply antagonizing a new user? It's a wiki, if you want to get people to keep their noses out of where they're not wanted, say it on a private location. —MaySig Warw/Wick 16:17, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
This argument is done. Don't discuss it further. --◄mendel► 16:19, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
Suicidal, get a break and be less dense. I have asked you to heed the advice on that page, I have not told you that you have done wrong: if that had been the case, you would be blocked now for not heeding that. In fact, on your user page you state "I did nothing wrong" (or not much anyway) and at the same time express surprise that you weren't blocked for doing nothing wrong. Maybe the wiki works the way it should for you? And random people have a right to voice opinions that annoy you? And you shouldn't fly into a rage about that, but rather consider whether they deserve an answer, and if so, which one? If you cannot do that, your discussion style will get you in trouble again and again, and by your userpage edit you have confirmed my prediction that it will eventually prove "wikicidal", i.e. that you will remove yourself from the wiki on your own. I would rather that did not happen. Stop and think, goddammit, and then stop again and think some more. --◄mendel► 16:19, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
be less dense: wow thanks
...and at the same time expect surprise that you weren't blocked...: take your own advice. Think again. My original intention was to post a few messages on the TalkPage belonging to a friend of mine. That was not the net result. I do not, surely, deserve anything for my original intention? As what I had planned to do came to completion, I fully credit the escalation to all else concerned, and couldn't care less about how ignorant it sounds that I blame everyone but me and of course Optime Doom + El Nazgir. While the end result was not what I intended, it was what I got judged on, what I got blamed for, and what I expected to be banned for.
'...random people... fly into rage...: well, I just joined in. Everyone else seemed angry enough at me so I don't see the significance of my fury when I wasn't the only involved person who was pissed off at some stage or another. I do not have a problem with other people editing TalkPages. I have a problem with them doing it when I had not planned on it ONLY FOR THEIR EDITING TO BE CLASSED AS WIKI DRAMA WHICH IS MY FAULT AND MY FAULT ALONE.
...that you will remove yourself from the wiki on your own: I have every intention of doing this. I have been annoyed at the userbase before and come back, deciding to ignore those who annoy me and repay my debt to those other contributers who helped me when I was a noob. Fuck that.
Don't you see what incenses me so? Even now Warwick is spamming 'No' on my TalkPage. I see nobody on her TalkPage attempting to stop her. We all feel bad for OptimeDoom, because archiving your TalkPage is suddenly humiliating (?!?) but nobody gives a shit about me? Consider being fair sometime in the future.
I would rather that did not happen.: believe it or not, I do appreciate the sentiment, but it is far too little far too late from far too few. -->Suicidal Tendencie Suicidal Tendencie Sig 16:35, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

(Reset indent) Everyone else seemed angry enough at me so I don't see the significance of my fury — the significance of your fury is that it keeps the anger (and the drama) fueled.

If you have a look at the history of Optime Doom's talk on March 12th alone, you can imagine what would have happened had you postponed replying for a day (or even an hour each); even more so as people reacted to you keeping raging. (Actually, look at Talk:Acorns; that was drama I unintentionally caused, and imagine what would have happened had I rebutted everyone who disagreed with me! Even so, people remembered that one for a looong time, and blamed me for it.)

20:21 El Nazgir 
20:17 JonTheMon 
20:14 Suicidal Tendencie 
20:09 JonTheMon 
20:04 Suicidal Tendencie 
20:00 Jink 
19:58 JonTheMon 
19:55 Suicidal Tendencie 
19:52 Randomtime 
19:51 Suicidal Tendencie 
19:50 JonTheMon 
19:48 Suicidal Tendencie 
19:46 JonTheMon 
19:39 Suicidal Tendencie 
19:08 JonTheMon  
19:07 Suicidal Tendencie 
19:05 Suicidal Tendencie 
19:02 El Nazgir 
18:59 Suicidal Tendencie  
18:54 Suicidal Tendencie 
18:52 Randomtime 
18:50 Optime Doom 
18:48 Suicidal Tendencie 
18:45 Randomtime 
18:42 Suicidal Tendencie 
18:36 Suicidal Tendencie 
18:34 M.mendel 
18:31 **The Falling One** 
18:30 Warwick 
18:26 Suicidal Tendencie  
18:21 M.mendel 
18:04 Suicidal Tendencie 
18:03 Suicidal Tendencie 
18:03 El Nazgir 
18:02 Suicidal Tendencie 
17:46 Suicidal Tendencie 

And this is El Nazgir's talk. Btw, at 18:38 this is me advising you to take a break for an hour.

19:43 Suicidal Tendencie 
19:04 El Nazgir 
19:01 Suicidal Tendencie 
19:00 El Nazgir 
18:40 Suicidal Tendencie 
18:38 M.mendel 
18:36 Suicidal Tendencie 
18:34 Suicidal Tendencie 
18:28 El Nazgir 
18:24 **The Falling One** 
18:23 Suicidal Tendencie 
18:22 Suicidal Tendencie 
18:19 El Nazgir 
18:19 El Nazgir 
18:11 Suicidal Tendencie 

The irony is that what began with a Piplup spam to a friend's userpage ends with you taking offense to your own page getting spammed. :-P --◄mendel► 22:48, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Hi.

No. —MaySig Warw/Wick 16:09, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Oh look, someone who's not me. Please be prepared to not have anyone give a shit you used my talkpage for no obvious reason whatsoever. -->Suicidal Tendencie Suicidal Tendencie Sig 16:11, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
No. —MaySig Warw/Wick 16:15, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
Saying that once again may well qualify as spamming my talkpage. -->Suicidal Tendencie Suicidal Tendencie Sig 16:19, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
Nyet. —MaySig Warw/Wick 16:32, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
Generhande. --◄mendel► 16:32, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
I'm being spammed and nobody gives a shit, fuck the lot of you for being inconsistant assholes. -->Suicidal Tendencie Suicidal Tendencie Sig 16:35, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
Spam is spam, and will eventually be dealt with (once it accumulates enough). And what do you do about mail/e-mail spam? Ignore it/shuffle it away. Oh, and keep this in mind
--JonTheMon 16:43, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Hello.

You have been blocked for 1 day for NPA. Calling someone a blatant asshole is, in fact, a personal attack. In addition to this, I believe that you need a break from the wiki. You are getting emotional over trivial matters, and indeed taking offence from somone offering you advice as to what to do in a situation. I understand that you are going to leave this wiki, however if you wish to continue editing after your block period is up, I would like to inform you that I, and I assume the rest of the wiki, do not in fact hate you, and that you are welcome to continue editing.. You can appeal your ban to either me, or another admin if you believe that I am bias against you. This is not Warwick-the-person-who-was-trolling-you, this is Warwick the impartial admin. I would also like to say that if anyone else disagrees with this ban, admin or no, please speak up your viewpoints. Thank you. —MaySig Warw/Wick 17:23, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

that is probably one of the worst decisions ever --Mini MeTalk 23:07, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
Voting for hitler. Lord of all tyria 23:26, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
Mini Me, actual arguments would be appreciated. The way it is now, both ST and Warwick get a day off, and that doesn't look so bad to me. --◄mendel► 23:30, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

I Apologise

Although perhaps you might not think I'm the one to blame or anything, I feel at least partially responsable. I was the first to, as you called it, stick my unwanted nose in to the matter. I feel bad that I started the whole thing by jokingly calling you an arse. I consider you as a friend, and I don't want to lose you because of some stupid wikidrama.

Also, a general note to everybody exept perhaps Mendel, who has already told you, but I believe it applies to everyone in the whole discussion: Calm Down! This has gotten way out of hand for such a small matter.

Next point, I believe the ban was unfair: first there is a heated discussiong in which Warwick also took part, then warwick provokes the already angry Suicidal who had been on the edge but didn't burst yet. The provocation causes Suicidal to finally "explode" and he insults someone who, seeing the situation, knew damn-well it would happen if she did what she did. (but I'm not quite sure what Mendel was doing there. Was that a spam too?)--TalkpageEl_Nazgir 20:43, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, spam cascades are our initiation rite. You'll find them all over the wiki on pages of popular users. --◄mendel► 21:43, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Sup

Guild wars! Lord of all tyria 23:31, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Advertisement