Favored:
Unfavoured:
Delete/Ban:
First post[]
On my own page.. =D -- Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 20:41, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
- Second post.-- (Talk) (Contr.) 20:42, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
- Damn. Ninja attack phailed.-- (Talk) (Contr.) 20:42, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
- Pwnt.. -- Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 20:43, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
- Warwick, you phail. What the french toast was up with that comment on archive 3. And its "prwnd" --Shadowcrest 20:43, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
- Pwnt.. -- Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 20:43, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
- Damn. Ninja attack phailed.-- (Talk) (Contr.) 20:42, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
- Hey, check out my proposal rough draft and tell me what else I should add or take away from it.-- (Talk) (Contr.) 19:07, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
- I added a very much needed line to the page --Gimmethegepgun 19:09, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
Pyramid[]
Dekboi had requested a spam pyramid! Care to help? I don't know when, but sometime soon, probably tomorrow. --Shadowcrest 23:19, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
Official Wiki[]
New messages for you.-- (Talk) (Contr.) 20:02, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
- Offical wiki phails tbh.. Spam war? Anyone up for helping my ele ascend? -- Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 20:09, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
- I was thinking something along the lines of IDS farming w/ my derv.-- (Talk) (Contr.) 20:10, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
- I was thinking along the lines of you coming to Amnoon and helping me ascent tbh. -- Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 20:11, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
- I was thinking you phail.. --Shadowcrest 20:13, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
- I was thinking, me=win-- (Talk) (Contr.) 20:15, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
- doh! I forgot marco was PvWin for a second there.. =P --Shadowcrest 20:16, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
- I was thinking BOTH of you come.. -- Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 20:17, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
- and HAH! Warwick had to change his font to a size three on GWW, which I had to do on both wikis ^^ I have a reason why u phail now warwick --Shadowcrest 20:18, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
- I was thinking BOTH of you come.. -- Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 20:17, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
- doh! I forgot marco was PvWin for a second there.. =P --Shadowcrest 20:16, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
- I was thinking, me=win-- (Talk) (Contr.) 20:15, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
- I was thinking you phail.. --Shadowcrest 20:13, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
- I was thinking along the lines of you coming to Amnoon and helping me ascent tbh. -- Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 20:11, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
- I was thinking something along the lines of IDS farming w/ my derv.-- (Talk) (Contr.) 20:10, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
Yeah![]
Your god damn right I added myself! I thought what I said about myself is true, isn't it!?! *.* The Chag 21:54, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
- sure you are. Cress Arvein 21:55, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
- Your mean :( The Chag 18:58, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
j1j2j3[]
yes that is me, i still play the game as well. just something to pass the time. it is kinda interesting that somebody would remember me outside of that game. happy hunting J1j2j3 16:05, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
Signature[]
Like my signature?! The Chag
Yeah, now it's just like everyone else's who copyed off of Shadow.-- (Talk) (Contr.) 18:35, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
Re: Ban vs Warning[]
I'm pretty sure there's no documented policy that says someone has to be warned and can only be banned after repeated violations. To me, a 3 day non-permenant ban is the warning for many situations. That said, I do give out warnings before bans on a case by case basis (usually against 1RV or heated discussions that are in the gray area of NPA). I never warn against vandalism. I think the difference is whether general good faith can be assumed about the user (breaking 1RV can come from an honest desire to improve the quality of the article, without realizing it causes trouble; headed discussion that borders on NPA can because the other guy crossed a certain invisible line, triggering a heated lash-back, instead of the user actually wanting to cause problems etc etc). -User:PanSola (talk to the ) 18:41, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
New Signature[]
HAAA!! A NEW ONE! NOW YOU GUYS WHO CLAIM THAT I "COPIED" SHADOWCREST IS WRONG! SUCK ON THAT!! The Chag
- Jokerman font? That's what I use on aim.-- (Talk) (Contr.) 19:14, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
- Well you are Less Able to Make Effectivness as a business man! So ha! The
- It shows a regular font on my computer ^^ and yeah, its wai too big--- -- (s)talkpage 10:38, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
- You're all just jealous because it's sexy :P The Chag 12:20, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
- Fine be that way! Nub! The Chag 15:53, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
- GW:NPA, mate. ^_^ -- Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 15:54, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
- But it's the truth, it's not actually cursing because it's not a lie. The Chag 16:00, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
- I know, it's not you, it's just when I use GuildWiki (as in when I log in and edit) it makes my computer freeze, which is why I'm just going to use it for information (When I use Guild Wars [Rarely atm]). The Chag 16:41, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
- But it's the truth, it's not actually cursing because it's not a lie. The Chag 16:00, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
- GW:NPA, mate. ^_^ -- Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 15:54, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
- Fine be that way! Nub! The Chag 15:53, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
- You're all just jealous because it's sexy :P The Chag 12:20, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
- It shows a regular font on my computer ^^ and yeah, its wai too big--- -- (s)talkpage 10:38, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
For Real or For Fake?[]
4 reel 4 lyfe? --71.255.3.152 17:10, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
- Im not joking about the "dont vandalise". -- Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 17:11, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
- ...Or are you?--71.255.3.152 17:11, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
Wikiaddiction[]
I keep pressing shift-alt-r to refresh the guild forum... And it's a hotkey to logging out >.> Damn annoying. And now, I'm going to get some sleep. --- -- (s)talkpage 22:56, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
Userboxes, lol[]
You literally stole every single one of my userboxes o.O.--igathrashTalk^Cont 19:19, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
- He did thesame with mine. My poor, poor userboxes! (although I have anew one he doesn't have(yet)) --- -- (s)talkpage 19:26, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
- Then "Go For The One With The Most None-Stolen Userboxes!" --- -- (s)talkpage 19:51, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
Why am i spamming my talk page? -- Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 19:55, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
- It -- Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 17:59, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
- Might -- Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 17:59, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
- Be -- Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 17:59, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
- Because -- Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 17:59, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
- Of -- Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 17:59, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
- The -- Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 17:59, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
- Fact -- Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 17:59, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
- That -- Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 17:59, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
- I -- Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 17:59, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
- Am -- Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 17:59, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
- Ext -- Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 17:59, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
- Road -- Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 17:59, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
- In -- Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 17:59, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
- Or -- Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 17:59, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
- Because -- Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 17:59, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
- Road -- Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 17:59, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
- You -- Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 17:59, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
- Ext -- Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 17:59, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
- Are -- Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 17:59, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
- Am -- Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 17:59, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
- Meant -- Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 17:59, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
- I -- Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 17:59, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
- To -- Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 17:59, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
- That -- Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 17:59, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
- Like -- Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 17:59, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
- Fact -- Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 17:59, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
- Spam -- Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 17:59, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
- The -- Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 17:59, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
- As -- Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 17:59, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
- Of -- Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 17:59, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
- A -- Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 17:59, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
- Because -- Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 17:59, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
- Member -- Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 17:59, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
- Be -- Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 17:59, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
- Of -- Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 17:59, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
- Might -- Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 17:59, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
- Teh Spam Crew!!!111One! -- Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 17:59, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
Mega-Pwnage-Ulta-Cool Pplz [In order of 1337-ness =D][]
Holy Hell... I'm more Mega-Pwnage-Ulta-Cool than Entropy ?! Something must be wrong here :P Isk8 19:57, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
SPAM PYRAMID![]
I call for a spam pyramid! -- Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 20:03, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
- Just -- Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 20:03, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
- To -- Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 20:03, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
- Get -- Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 20:03, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
- us started off ive added 5! -- Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 20:03, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
- In memory of Auron I'm spamming less ;) Lord of all tyria 20:04, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
- Me too. Which is the reason that I added this completely necessary and important comment on your talk page, which I am on.-- (Talk) (Contr.) 20:10, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
- Have another tier.--igathrashTalk^Cont 20:11, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
- Yey -- Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 20:12, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
- Some -- Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 20:12, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
- Yey -- Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 20:12, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
- Have another tier.--igathrashTalk^Cont 20:11, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
- Me too. Which is the reason that I added this completely necessary and important comment on your talk page, which I am on.-- (Talk) (Contr.) 20:10, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
- In memory of Auron I'm spamming less ;) Lord of all tyria 20:04, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
- us started off ive added 5! -- Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 20:03, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
- Get -- Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 20:03, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
- To -- Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 20:03, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
- On YOUR talk page! *runs off* --- -- (s)talkpage 20:16, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
- 'tis still being made.. -- Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 20:17, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
- How big do you make a pyramid before you start going down?--igathrashTalk^Cont 20:18, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
- Couple'a tiers off the end of the page. -- Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 20:19, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
- Tier--igathrashTalk^Cont 20:20, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
- Another Tier--igathrashTalk^Cont 20:20, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
- Not a tier o.O--igathrashTalk^Cont 20:20, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
- I believe I actually invented the spam pyramid.-- (Talk) (Contr.) 20:21, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
- Not true marco. -- Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 20:22, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
- Tiers are FTW! -- Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 20:22, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
- WEEE TIERS! -- Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 20:22, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
- Yay.. -- Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 20:22, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
- yay v2.. -- Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 20:22, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
- BTW marco, the egyptian leader Warwick made the spam pyramids. -- Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 20:22, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
- yay v2.. -- Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 20:22, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
- Yay.. -- Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 20:22, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
- WEEE TIERS! -- Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 20:22, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
- Tiers are FTW! -- Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 20:22, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
- Not true marco. -- Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 20:22, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
- I believe I actually invented the spam pyramid.-- (Talk) (Contr.) 20:21, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
- Not a tier o.O--igathrashTalk^Cont 20:20, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
- Another Tier--igathrashTalk^Cont 20:20, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
- Tier--igathrashTalk^Cont 20:20, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
- Couple'a tiers off the end of the page. -- Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 20:19, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
- How big do you make a pyramid before you start going down?--igathrashTalk^Cont 20:18, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
- 'tis still being made.. -- Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 20:17, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
- On YOUR talk page! *runs off* --- -- (s)talkpage 20:16, 8 December 2007 (UTC)