GuildWiki has been locked down: anonymous editing and account creation are disabled. Current registered users are unaffected. Leave any comments on the Community Portal.
For using a show/hide box that doesn't start closed. And the spacing is screwed over on FF. But oh well, it's not my talk page :P Oh, and he has red links in his archives box. Wich, without the red links, is really neat ^^ Banbanbanbanana. EDIT: And Unfavored/Ban didn't show up. /fail. Fixed it as of 27th Feb. 2008 --- -- (s)talkpage 16:11, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
To my talkpage. —Warw/Wick 20:45, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
Warw, I want to test IRC, so Get on | Talk 21:10, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
Moved from Image talkpage[]
Archived Topics[]
Image uploader isnt the copyright holder, Maui is. Not sure on the licensing. —Warw/Wick 14:48, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
The licensing is proper. It was a picture taken by you, and modified by a guild wiki member here, who gave you the image to upload freely. -- Sk8(T/C) 14:51, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
Guys, come on. Lots of girls' eyes change color and ears become unpierced. 13:23, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
I'm not going to bother arguing with you about it. Believe what you want. -.-, and Felix, my ears WEREN'T pierced.. —Warw/Wick 13:25, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
I can upload more pics if you want. I found a folder labeled "James' Pics" and presumed that they were pics of my bro. Nope, they're pics of me taken by my bro. —Warw/Wick 13:36, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Rather big change in appearance from the two pics. First off, to Felix, ears doclose up if no earings are in them for a timeframe. Nextly, how old are you, if you don't mind my asking, May. -- Sk8(T/C) 13:45, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Clearly you were detecting false amounts of sarcasm where none existed. 13:46, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
17. Its ironic. when I was 13, I looked like a 10 year old. Now I'm 17, I look like I'm about 20.. And the change was because the old pic was from when I was 13 =|. and What, Felix? —Warw/Wick 13:47, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Sorry Felix, I speak sarcasm fluently, but don't understand a lick of it :P -- Sk8(T/C) 13:50, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Poll[]
Please vote the third latest, since a) the first is too risque and b) it breaks the page in ie.. —Warw/Wick 15:10, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Can people say what they voted? —Warw/Wick 18:28, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Votes[]
Latest[]
*meow* :D lol --Shadowphoenix 18:52, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
last one that is *harrrr* Yuff S T A R 18:56, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Cough. (Talk • Contribs) 19:39, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Tsk Tsk[]
I found a youtube video, and may is danciong in it and singing look (this is not so serious btw):
{{#widget:YouTube|id=phPmbCawl-I|width=400|height=300}}
--Shadowphoenix 18:56, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Wow, Video is no longer available. That was fast! -- Sk8(T/C) 18:56, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
wtf, it doesnt do that to me :S --Shadowphoenix 18:58, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Does it work now? --Shadowphoenix 19:02, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Not for me. But the preview image works :P --- -- (s)talkpage 19:03, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Don't work here. Though I blocked a random popup from trying to play it, then hit allow popups and haven't had it come up again lol. -- Sk8(T/C) 19:04, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Somebody else post a youtube video, see if it plays if not then on th the wikia noticeboard. --Shadowphoenix 19:05, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Because I can:
{{#widget:YouTube|id=8aeQ8D_IW20|width=300|height=250}}
-- -- talkpage 19:07, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Plays for me --Shadowphoenix 19:08, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Strange. It plays but its weird. First time it opens a new tab to youtube. I close that and click it again then it plays on this screen. -- Sk8(T/C) 19:09, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
{{#widget:YouTube|id=phPmbCawl-I|width=300|height=250}} how is that? --Shadowphoenix 19:11, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
>.< wtf, brb let me get on my laptop and see what happens --Shadowphoenix 19:16, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
(edit conflict) It plays if you copy the url and go to youtube. Perhaps wikia has a built in filter of some sort that blocks "bad" videos? Lets face it, Brittney Sluts is bad... -- Sk8(T/C) 19:17, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
It doesn't matter because you are all maggots. >:( Yikey∞ 19:18, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
You may kill us, but in the end, we are still all over your rotting corpse. -- Sk8(T/C) 19:19, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
{{#widget:YouTube|id=phPmbCawl-I|width=300|height=250}} ok this is from y laptop diff IP, lets see what that does. --Shadowphoenix 19:21, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
And still nope -- Sk8(T/C) 19:25, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
And if you are sharing an internet connection in your home via router... your laptop would not have a diff IP addy. -- Sk8(T/C) 19:26, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
No they are seperate --Shadowphoenix 19:30, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Yarly. :p. No, seriously though, that was under my light in my room, which has a white wallpaper. —Warw/Wick 22:38, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
And your ex-boyfriend's house has the exact same lighting and wallpaper? How sweet. 22:40, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
No, actually. Its not the same. Just similar. —Warw/Wick 22:41, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
This is a real pic[]
I looked over the old images and compared them to the new ones at this is all real. Look:
They have the same face structure --Shadowphoenix 22:46, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Either that or she spent a disturbing amount of time on an image search looking for hot people that look like her.Entrea[Talk] 22:48, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
I think that it is her with a minor changes that happen to the face during um... that luvly time period; and a heap of make-up :D --Shadowphoenix 22:49, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
same nose, eyebrow, cheeck, brow, hairline, and mouth D: you're pretty May :D Lost-Blue 22:50, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Your front teeth did shrink noticeably though. --Shadowcrest 22:53, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
That may have to do with the fact that none of my teeth fell out till I was about 14.. —Warw/Wick 22:56, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
(edit conflict) here proof that the teeth are the same (with a bit of a diff because of May's explanation) --Shadowphoenix 22:59, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Got any pics that don't appear to be professionally modeled? Say, less makeup and more background? 23:00, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
The first one? —Warw/Wick 23:02, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
I vote for impromptu pictar liek nao. Gogogo (Talk • Contribs) 23:11, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Actually, Shadow, you can't say they have the same face structure. Similar, yes, but obviously the new pictures have a three-quarter profile while the original picture is face front. The primary differences in a person's facial structures, ie, chin, brow, and cheekbones, and to a lesser extent nose, can't be gauged properly between differing angles like that. From what I can see, though, the two women have differing chins and the older woman's face is less heart-shaped. 23:27, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
I swear every time someone says shadow i think me. --Shadowcrest 23:29, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
(RI.) Poor Shadowcrest. <3 23:29, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Really Maui, the chin is what made me believe that it was real... --Shadowphoenix 23:32, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Like I said, it can't be gauged when they're at two completely different angles. But looking at the bottom pic and the top one, where she is grinning broadly in both, the older woman's chin appears less pointed, and not as "long". 23:38, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Okay, here is a pic May posted previously which does include her entire face. The differences should be obvious, but I'll still point out the larger mouth, slightly cleft chin and squarer jaw. Anyway, I'm done with this conversation, May can upload whatever pic she likes, this sort of scrutiny is unwarranted. 23:43, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Well there is a little tiny thing that tends to drasticly change your face structure, any guesses as to what it is? (still think it is a real pic btw) --Shadowphoenix 23:48, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
PUBERTY!!!!!! Lost-Blue 23:49, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
I agree with Maui May can do upload any pictures she like'swithout any contraversy ( think i spelt that rite lol ... if not its as im rly tired :P ftw ) --Cookie™(Talk |Contribs) 23:49, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Well i was pretty close Viper lol :)... IMHO i think its real if that helps :] --Cookie™(Talk |Contribs) 06:48, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
Doesn't really matter. After being bored and reading through the requests for arbitation, I think that given the summary, Stabber seems a lot like me. :/ —Warw/Wick 06:58, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
The Stabber case was long and complicated with a lot of history and different to this as far as I can tell. That said this discussion has gone on long enough, far more has been said than needs to be, there's no need for any more people weighing in on this, enough has been said, this is getting far too personal and you can all draw your own conclusions without further discussion. --Xasxas256 07:16, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
win. well, progger is win by default — Nova — (contribs) 02:41, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
I didn't figure it out Nova, it was the anon above me ;) -- -- talkpage 08:52, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
I dont mind, tbh. —Warw/Wick 07:19, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
If a group of builders wolf whistle at a female employee and she likes the attention is that sexual harassment? What if they then whistle at another female employee who doesn't like it and brings it up with her boss? What if the builders only wolf whistle at one employee who likes it but it makes other people uncomfortable? Even if you're not too fussed about it by allowing it to continue (and I don't see that discussion going anywhere good by the way) the administration group is endorsing it as acceptable. Personally, I would not like those comments directed towards me and I don't like the idea of rubber stamping it. I can also see how others reading that in depth analysis of your features could be uncomfortable. I don't think any warnings are necessary and I'm always happy to have a bit of fun but this was taking things too far. I don't mind seeing commentary on people's photos that's fine just so long as people don't overstep the boundary of making a few funny comments and getting too personal, if we can take that on board then I consider this matter closed. --Xasxas256 07:35, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
No, I mean I don't mind the spam. I don't like people questioning my existance, but I do like the spam. :p. —Warw/Wick 07:41, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
Well good we're on the same page then; spam is fine but levelling accusations at someone and/or bringing their character into question isn't acceptable. That is unless it directly pertains to their role on GuildWiki such as an accusation of sockpuppetry and is backed up by evidence. --Xasxas256 07:50, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
Allright Crew, you heard the guy. Spam is acceptable! —Warw/Wick 07:54, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
Do you wear contacts? Jamster 08:10, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
Yeah, how did you know? —Warw/Wick 08:13, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
You eyes looked glazed. Jamster 08:22, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
That may be my eye colour... —Warw/Wick 08:39, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
"Glazed" isn't an eye color. 08:58, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
Eye colour makes my eyes look kinda glazed. Or yeah, it may be the contacts. —Warw/Wick 09:02, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
Oho[]
27, I think you'll find, not 17. Jamster 19:45, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
Slash agree. Revert tbh. <3 — Nova — (contribs) 02:36, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
Yes, the last picture was better. This one makes you look ADD. It gives the impression of "I think I'll take a picture of myse- HEY, LOOK, A SQUIRREL! *snap*" Lord Belar 02:55, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
The last picture was also a famous actress. (Talk • Contribs) 02:56, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
Yeah, this one is an actual picture of me :p.. —Warw/Wick 12:25, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
Moved[]
To the archive. —Warw/Wick 12:30, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
I know how to stop all the comments that it's not you. Take a picture of yourself holding a sign that says "I <3 GuildWiki". That'll shut everyone up. Unless they're right, of course.Entrea[T] 17:28, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
Go google image search Kristen Bell. In fact, I'll do it for you. [3] Any of those pictures look familiar? (Talk • Contribs) 17:31, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
Actually, Ent, such a sign is relatively easily forged. Writing the same message on her hand and holding that to the camera would be slightly more reliable. :] 17:37, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
Well, I guess, according to GW:AGF, we can't fairly say that Warwick is trying to pretend to be Kristen Bell. However, the following is true:
We cares. Because it's fun to make fun of talk to Warwick about her using very fake pictures.Entrea[T] 17:43, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
Note that none of the pics are actually on there.. —Warw/Wick 20:46, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
Although it's extremely odd that Ruricu was able to pinpoint a female model on sight, I do feel highly vindicated. :D 20:49, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
What does that statement even mean, "Note that none of the pics are actually on there.."? —♥Jedi♥Rogue♥ 20:50, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
The pics are on the google link, and the actress was identified shortly before the last archive --Powersurge360 20:51, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
Ah well. :P. I'll think about putting a real pic up :p. I was talking about the links in the Userbox tbh. —Warw/Wick 20:52, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
(Reset indent) Great, now I get to mistrust Warwick even more | Talk
Is that even possible? —Warw/Wick 20:53, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
(edit conflict) To quote a wise man "Judge not people as they were, but what they are soon to be, allow yourself to understand the nature of the person, rather than the nature of their deeds. Treat people with compassion and honesty, and they will grow to be compassionate and honest." --Powersurge360 20:55, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
wise men didn't/don't live in 2008 Lost-Blue 20:57, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
Because I totally said they do, ya know? lol --Powersurge360 20:58, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
I'm not sure as to exactly why you'd want to keep a record of your lies and the accusations that followed. May as well have kept the image talk pages in that case, to preserve revision history and such. 21:45, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
because you said that you usually deleted orphan talk pages? —Warw/Wick 21:48, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
I don't do that as a matter of policy; you requested it. 21:52, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
Somone said once that it was policy to deleted orphaned talk pages. —Warw/Wick 21:53, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
oh look, even more drama! — Nova — (contribs) 21:55, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
Stop it nova, we all know you love drama. :p. —Warw/Wick 21:56, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
(Talk • Contribs) 17:40, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
